Remember Me?
Menu
Home
Search
Today's Posts
Home
Search
Today's Posts
RadioBanter
»
rec.radio.amateur
»
Antenna
>
Zo and Ro
LinkBack
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes
Prev
Next
#
14
November 23rd 04, 03:36 PM
Dr. Slick
Posts: n/a
(Robert Lay W9DMK) wrote in message ...
The condition for which Zo of a transmission line is always purely resistive
(Zo = Ro) is extremely simple. It is -
G = C * R / L
where G is shunt conductance, C is shunt capacitance, R is series
resistance, L is series inductance, all per unit length of line.
Well, that is pretty entertaining and
interesting, i will admit. However, the
result isn't very practical...
Most texts just assume lossless conditions,
so that R and G equal zero, so that Zo is
again, always purely real, and only dependant
on the distributed inductance and capacitance
of the transmission line.
Which applies to any line length, at any frequency from DC to UHF.
It is a shortcoming of the Smith Chart, with Zo always equal to Ro, that it
does not make you aware of this and can lead you up the garden path if you
are not careful. As has recently occurred on this newsgroup.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not against Smith Charts. They are graphically
educational within their limitations.
----
Reg, G4FGQ
Dear Reg,
You say that it is a shortcoming of the Smith Chart that Zo equals Ro.
However, I think that is either a misunderstanding or just misleading.
The Smith Chart only constrains the normalizing quantity to be purely
resistive - not the characteristic impedance of a particular
transmission line being shown on that chart. My program, SmartSmith,
for example, allows the user to specify both an Ro and an Xo term for
all transmission line sections.
When it's all said and done, the Smith Chart only implements the
transmission line equation (as shown on pages 24-10 and 27-29 in the
17th Edition of The ARRL Antenna Book).
You know, this seems to be quite a theory
problem regarding the Smith Chart. This goes back to
the heated argument on the Gamma reflection
coefficient using the conjugate of Zo in the
numerator.
Since i trust Les Besser more than
other people, i'm gonna assume that
you indeed CAN normalize a Smith chart
to a complex Zo. That is, a Zo that
is not a purely real impedance.
Slick
Reply With Quote
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Show Printable Version
Search this Thread
:
Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode
Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode
Posting Rules
Smilies
are
On
[IMG]
code is
On
HTML code is
Off
Trackbacks
are
On
Pingbacks
are
On
Refbacks
are
On
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
10:35 AM
.
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
Contact Us
RadioBanter forum home
Privacy Statement
Copyright © 2017
LinkBack
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks