Cecil Moore wrote:
Dr. Slick wrote:

When was the last time you used
"G = C * R / L" for anything?


Yesterday.

Just curious, Cecil. What were you using a distortionless line
for?
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH

Tom Donaly wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:

Dr. Slick wrote:
When was the last time you used
"G = C * R / L" for anything?

Yesterday.

Just curious, Cecil. What were you using a distortionless line
for?

Methinks you jumped to conclusions. Slick didn't ask when was
the last time I used a distortionless line. He asked when was
the last time I used the equation "G=C*R/L" for anything. I'm
using it right now. I used it yesterday to refresh my memory
about distortionless lines which I did use quite often before
I retired from Intel in 1998. If I presently held a job in the
cable modem group, I suppose I would still be using them.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

Cecil Moore wrote:
Tom Donaly wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:

Dr. Slick wrote:

When was the last time you used
"G = C * R / L" for anything?


Yesterday.


Just curious, Cecil. What were you using a distortionless line
for?


Methinks you jumped to conclusions. Slick didn't ask when was
the last time I used a distortionless line. He asked when was
the last time I used the equation "G=C*R/L" for anything. I'm
using it right now. I used it yesterday to refresh my memory
about distortionless lines which I did use quite often before
I retired from Intel in 1998. If I presently held a job in the
cable modem group, I suppose I would still be using them.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

I'm surprised the golden ears croud hasn't discovered distortionless
lines as a means of separating the gullible from their gold.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH