Richard Clark wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:
Here's the equation that Ramo and Whinnery says is an approximation
for low-loss lines.

So you keep saying.

This is the first time I have posted the equation.

Is it that difficult to find their exact solution
for any lines?

Maybe the math is easier for the approximation?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 09:26:50 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:
Is it that difficult to find their exact solution for any lines?
Maybe the math is easier for the approximation?
Can only guess? That's OK, Bart did it for you. You should at least
thank him for filling this gap.

Richard Clark wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:
Maybe the math is easier for the approximation?

Can only guess?

Nope, rhetorical question.