| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Clark wrote: On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 16:13:44 -0600, Cecil Moore wrote: ExH traveling in one direction is positive. Radiation ExH traveling in the opposite direction is negative. Rearadiation You got transmitters in Texas that suck? Maybe so. Texas certainly does seem to have its own unique set of physical laws. ;-) "Physicists say no work is done if the starting line and the finish line are the same for a marathon." :-) No physicist I know would ever say something like that. Only a gross misapplication of Newtonian mechanics and/or thermodynamics could lead someone to such a belief. For example, such a person might think that a ball thrown up into the air has had zero work performed on it after it returns to the hand which threw it. The fact is, it requires as much work to return it to the earth as it does to throw it into the air. (There are some interesting physics demonstrations on how this doubling of work can be used to interesting advantage.) But since in mechanics there is no such thing as negative work, total work is accumulative. Potential and kinetic energies are of course restored to initial conditions, but the conversion from one to the other does not ordinarily occur without some form of external 'help'. The misunderstanding is at least consistent with some similar misunderstandings that have been expressed with regard to the physics of power and energy. ac6xg |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Current in antenna loading coils controversy - new measurement | Antenna | |||
| Complex line Z0: A numerical example | Antenna | |||
| A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
| Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) | Antenna | |||