Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 19:47:48 +0000 (UTC), David Snyder Hale
wrote: I haven't been able to find any reviews of the Miracle QPak antenna tuner. Does anyone have experience and comments? Their web page makes it sound like they are finally bringing amateur radio out of the dark ages of tuners, but is it all that? Does this look like $150 worth of parts? http://www.miracleantenna.com/QPackinside.htm ??? Bob k5qwg |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's not obvious to me why the reactance of the link needs to be 50 ohms
(for a 50 ohm resistive source) to be "ideal for the maximum transfer of power" in a conventional link coupled tuner, as VA2ERY says on the web page. Maximum transfer of power requires only that the input and output impedances be properly (conjugately) matched (and, of course, loss to be minimized), and that doesn't require the link reactance to be any particular value.(*) The argument for the supposedly wonderful performance of the tuner seems to revolve around solving this "problem", and it falls pretty flat if it's not a problem at all. Can someone enlighten me as to why the link reactance needs to be 50 ohms? (*) The capacitor and inductor voltage and current can be traded against each other by changing the L/C ratio. Depending on the particular components used, there'll be some ratio at which loss is minimum. But this depends on the components, and not some universal value. And it would have no effect I can see on the transfer of power, which requires only a conjugate match. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Bob Miller wrote: . . . http://www.miracleantenna.com/QPackinside.htm |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Trade Kenwood for Tuner | Antenna | |||
Trade Kenwood for Tuner | Antenna | |||
FC-20 Antenna Tuner broken on 10m ? | Antenna | |||
When antenna tuner won't tune | Antenna | |||
Tuner detunes antenna | Antenna |