Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 22:23:47 -0500, "Dave VanHorn"
wrote: | | So, in all honesty, YOU can't really say how dangerous operation of an FM | receiver will be; but you KNOW that it's potentially harmful. | |Given that the aircraft voice comms are just above the FM BCB, and the |typical first IF is 10.7 MHz, it's not too hard to imagine the LO sitting |right on the tower comm frequency. |You may only radiate a microwatt, but you're much closer to that antenna on |the aircraft than the tower is. Inverse square law makes it very easy for |you to win that contest. Correct. Let me offer a slightly different but illustrative example. Since this is cross-posted to some non-ham groups, bear with me. In the 1960's I operated my amateur station on the two-meter (144 MHz) band using several hundred watts of AM and directional antennas. I'm in Tucson where we have both a commercial airport and D-M AFB. An acquaintance of mine, also a ham, was the FAA tower chief at Tucson International. One day he calls me on the phone and says that the tower guys at D-M, knowing he was a ham, called him first rather than the FCC, to report that I was interfering with their tower communications. To make an involved detective story short, it turned out that another ham, who lived just outside the AFB was using a Heathkit "Twoer". The Twoer used a super-regenerative receiver and was picking up my signal and re-radiating it on the tower frequencies. I was getting blamed for the other guy's illegal transmissions. Considering that this technology is probably used in more receivers today than any other type (garage door openers, computer wireless links, etc.) if I'm flying, I hope they are all turned off. | |This is a pointless argument though. It's a health and safety issue, and |you either follow the airline's rules, or I hope they boot you off the plane |(optionally, landing first for your convenience) It is just that simple. | |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Our club repeater also ended up interfering with the local tower.
It seems that the transmitter PLL was unstable, and "hopping" between that frequency, and ours. We were clearly audible in their recordings. Lest any "experts" step in and claim that you can't receive FM on an AM receiver, I'd ask them to consider what effect the passband filter of the AM receiver's IF might have on the FM signal as it deviates from side to side.... I hit the magic codes and took the repeater down, once we determined that this was indeed the source. A re-tweak of the transmit PLL, and a stub filter cut to pass 146.730 and reject the tower frequency, cured the problem, and insured that if it ever happens again, they probably won't hear us. The tower now has our phone numbers in their books, in case there is ever another problem. The tower complimented our rapid and assertive handling of the problem in their closing letter to the FCC. Repeater cans don't do much for signals that are far out of band. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Our club repeater also ended up interfering with the local tower.
It seems that the transmitter PLL was unstable, and "hopping" between that frequency, and ours. We were clearly audible in their recordings. Ouch. That'd be categorized as a "double-plus ungood" for certain! Lest any "experts" step in and claim that you can't receive FM on an AM receiver, I'd ask them to consider what effect the passband filter of the AM receiver's IF might have on the FM signal as it deviates from side to side.... I believe the magic words are "slope detection". The resulting audio on the AM receiver isn't great (it's often distorted) but it's certainly there. I hit the magic codes and took the repeater down, once we determined that this was indeed the source. A re-tweak of the transmit PLL, and a stub filter cut to pass 146.730 and reject the tower frequency, cured the problem, and insured that if it ever happens again, they probably won't hear us. The tower now has our phone numbers in their books, in case there is ever another problem. The tower complimented our rapid and assertive handling of the problem in their closing letter to the FCC. Well done! -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Years ago I was flying in a friends private plane. I used a Ht on 146.52 to
make some contacts. My friend announces that we are lost. It took about 10 minutes before I found a landmark and got him following a road to the airport. My friend believes that the HT interfered with his radio compass and put use off course. After the HT was turned off and time was allowed, the compass returned to normal. I don't know how it happened, but it did! Now I just carry my ht on the plane and do not operate! Randy ka4nma |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
'Course, he was also a ham and we were flying in a sailplane that had a couple of light bulbs for electronics. [g] The only way to fly. Well, if one of the light bulbs goes out, they'll blame it on the nearest ham Seems pretty safe, but I still wouldn't do it without permission. I'm like that when I drive. I'm in the left seat, it's my car and my ass, and I make the decisions. I have actually had a passenger throw a fit because I wouldn't make a left turn that I wasn't convinced was safe, in the 1-2 seconds I had to look at it when the passenger hollered "turn left here". He got to walk home. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Automotive Diversity Reception problems- 98 Corvette | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
How to connect external antenna to GE Super Radio III | Antenna | |||
Review: Amateur Radio Companion 3rd Edition | Antenna | |||
Reception in a tin can | Antenna |