LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #18   Report Post  
Old December 31st 04, 07:25 AM
Jack Painter
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Richard Harrison" wrote

Jack Painter wrote:
"Scientists have now shown that blunt-tipped air terminals are attached
by lightning significantly higher frequency than sharp rods are."

I would have expected that sharp-pointed rods would be struck more
often.


Hi Richard, yes, you and Ben Franklin agreed on that. Modeling examples you
cited below appear to be incorrect for lightning, similar to how modeling
for ocean waves cannot be done in a bathtub, and even a swimming pool does
not closely replicate the action of waves in a large body of water. The
experiments and the conclusions offered by the blunt-tip lightning rod tests
were peer reviewed, are repeatable, and are being further studied. Their
conclusions describe behavior that was not expected or explainable by
current modeling. However it is easy to rocket-trigger lightning and this is
being done on a daily basis, so a few thousand repeatable findings should
soon arrive at a more permanent conclusion. Whether or not that is
explainable in terms that classroom scientists can model remains to be seen.
An awful lot of engineers have accepted the findings already, and specify
blunt-tip rods on new construction. The same cannot be said about other
questionable and unrepeatable theory such as charge transfer systems and
lightning charge dissipators. Their popularity relies soley on the ability
of snake-oil salesman conning a confused public.

73,
Jack Painter
Virginia Beach, Virginia



My CRC "Handbook of Chemistry and Physics" starts its coverage of
"Electricity and Magneyism with a page on Spark Gap Voltages. In every
case for a given breakdown voltage, the gap must be substantially wider
when the electrodes are needle-points than when they are spheres. For
example: With a voltage across the electrodes of 5 KV, the gap space
between needle-points needed to prevent a spark is 0.42 cm. The gap
between 5-cm sphheres is 0.15 cm under the same conditions. Much closer
before sparking points obviously means sharp points engourage breakdown
of the air between the points, while spherical (blunt) spark-gap
electrodes discourage the spark.

It`s been said that if the chsrges dont pile op at the pointed end of a
conductor, it would not have an equipotential surface as is required by
the conductivity ("College Physics" by Franklin Miller, Jr.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Automotive Diversity Reception problems- 98 Corvette Eric Antenna 1 January 28th 04 11:19 PM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 04:01 PM
How to connect external antenna to GE Super Radio III Jim Antenna 2 October 18th 03 04:12 PM
Review: Amateur Radio Companion 3rd Edition Mick Antenna 0 September 24th 03 09:38 AM
Reception in a tin can ElMalo Antenna 6 August 29th 03 05:49 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017