Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:03:37 -0800, "Joel Kolstad"
wrote: "Ed Price" wrote in message news:gAdBd.6143$yW5.2@fed1read02... We spend a lot of time now arguing about how well the computer model replicates reality, and whether the math has enough variables accounted for. Working models seem so old fashioned. That's because they're so expensive to build. You'd probably never finish designing something like a modern RF IC if all you could do was design it on paper, build it, probe around a little to figure out what it 'really' does, and repeat. Likewise, few companies can afford to design the autopilot for a jet without a great deal of simulation first. :-) Hi Guys, Back when I designed the UFDR for the 757/767, they were the first airplanes designed entirely in software (conventional drafting went the way of the Dodo). Today's 7E7 was entirely modeled in software if I'm not mistaken. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Automotive Diversity Reception problems- 98 Corvette | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
How to connect external antenna to GE Super Radio III | Antenna | |||
Review: Amateur Radio Companion 3rd Edition | Antenna | |||
Reception in a tin can | Antenna |