Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The last chapter.
There's yet another point in favour of twin-balanced line rather than coax for a choke balun. As previously stated, the length of line wound on it is best not allowed to exceed about 1/8-wavelength at the highest frequency of interest at the line's own velocity factor. Solid polyethylene coax has an appreciably lower velocity factor than twin line such as figure-of-eight speaker cable. Or two separate wires wound alongside each other. Consequently, for the same length of balun line in wavelengths, more twin-line turns can wound on the ferrite core than coax turns. This increases LF inductance and extends the lower frequency downwards. Or alternatively, with a shorter physical length of line on the balun, the higher frequency is extended upwards. The usable bandwidth of the twin-line version therefore increases roughly in the ratio of the two velocity factors. A choke balun may indeed be amongst the most simple of radio components to construct - its true complexity being hidden. But as always with radio, almost anything will work! ---- Reg, G4FGQ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Transmission Lines & Electrical Code | Antenna | |||
Question re High Tension Lines | Antenna | |||
Question about attenuators ... | Antenna | |||
BPL industry take on why power lines are not antennas | Antenna | |||
basic question about radio waves !!!! | Antenna |