Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Sheffield wrote:
Irv & Mike - the radials don't have to be tuned? Or - the real quesion - they aren't random length, you're still talking about cutting a bunch for 80M, a bunch for 40M and a bunch for 20M (or something like that) and then fanning out all the radials from the base, correct? Question - if and when I put up a vertical, how close can it be to a tree, the house, etc, if ground-mounted? tnx - Mark On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 16:29:22 +0000, Mike Luther wrote: Very good advice, Irv Irv Finkleman wrote: If you plan to be at your QTH for a while, it's not difficult to lay untuned radials along the ground, or bury them down a half inch or so with a pizza cutter. I laid mine in the grass and after a couple of months you don't even see them anymore -- the mower goes right over them. If you are concerned, you can nail them down using hairpins. They not only serve as a great base for a vertical, but they also provide a very good rf ground. They don't have to be any special length -- its the quantity that counts. If you are going to tune radials, they have to be above ground level by a distance that makes setting up a vertical a much more complex matter. The idea of tuned radials allows you to operate with as few as three and provide an effective rf balance for the antenna. The main idea of the radials, tuned or untuned is an rf ground to act as the phantom half of the vertical. They need not be tuned, but if you lay them on or below the ground you need more of them. On the ground, what would have been a tuned radial, interacts with the soil and detunes, so the length becomes unimportant. You provide the ground by using more radials of various lengths, and they need not be spread out as 'radially' as the pictures show -- but the more the merrier, and the more effective they will be. One of my verticals was four feet from the house. I fired an arrow into the air, so to speak, but my arrows (signals) landed into a lot of very interesting places (other stations). Some lucky guys have their verticals mounted right at a tree and use it for the vertical support. Hope this is clearer than mud :-) Irv -- -------------------------------------- Diagnosed Type II Diabetes March 5 2001 Beating it with diet and exercise! 297/215/210 (to be revised lower) 58"/43"(!)/44" (already lower too!) -------------------------------------- Visit my HomePage at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv/ Visit my very special website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv4/ Visit my CFSRS/CFIOG ONLINE OLDTIMERS website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv5/ -------------------- Irv Finkleman, Grampa/Ex-Navy/Old Fart/Ham Radio VE6BP Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mobile Antenna Question | Antenna | |||
RC antenna in confined space | Antenna | |||
MQ26 antenna mini-review | Antenna | |||
How was antenna formula for uV/Meter Derived? | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |