Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 22:49:22 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote: So what? Hi Cecil, Exactly, you don't have a clue by how much do you? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newton may not have been EXACTLY right but he had a damned near-enough
practical approximation. Much better than a rough-and-ready Bird. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg Edwards wrote:
Newton may not have been EXACTLY right but he had a damned near-enough practical approximation. What was his approximation for the orbit of Mercury? :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newton may not have been EXACTLY right but he had a damned near-enough
practical approximation. What was his approximation for the orbit of Mercury? :-) ====================== In MY thermometer mercury does not rotate - it just goes up and down. According to Bush it's something to do with apple trees. --- Reg |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|