LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old October 8th 03, 12:07 AM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 13:54:34 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:

wrote:
OK, here's an interesting data point. I adjusted my IC-756PRO for 5W
output on 7.2 MHz using the following circuit.

7.2MHz 5W source---(+j442)---(-j442)---50 ohm dummy load

SWR meter at the dummy load read 5W forward with an SWR of 1:1

Then I installed the SWR meter between the coil and the cap. With 5W
supplied by the source, the forward power read 150 watts. Indicated
SWR was 3:1


Hi Cecil, And so?


And so it seems to support your variable SWR observations.


Hi Cecil,

With 5W supplied you read 150W forward?

Well that aside, it is not very remarkable to see 1:1 into a dummy
load. It is also not very remarkable to see 3:1 into a complex load.
You do not state you have any transmission line between the two
reactances until you dropped in the SWR meter, that isn't particularly
meaningful either. So, in the end, you demonstrate nothing of my
examples that have always been premised with a transmission line being
integral to the concept.

The short of it: I have always described this as a problem involving
two resistors and a hank of line. The long of it: You have merely
demonstrated your own invention of two conjugated reactances and one
resistor - not the same thing at all, not even conceptually.

Now, if you added a 1foot length between the two reactances, and then
replaced that with a two foot length, and then replaced that with a
three foot length, and then replaced that with a four foot length....
out to at least half a wave of electrical length. And all the while
taking forward and reverse power readings (or SWR, take your choice)
and specified the frequency THEN and ONLY THEN would you be able to
make a first pass comparison.

To take an observation from Metrology: one measurement tells you
nothing of any accuracy, two measurements only confuse, three begins
to reveal a true measure, more improves matters. Your two readings
say nothing to the matter (Mismatch Uncertainty) and actually confirm
expectations that lie outside of my examples.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the Richard Harrison Antenna 58 September 3rd 03 04:49 AM
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into thesame... Richard Harrison Antenna 99 August 30th 03 06:26 PM
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) Dr. Slick Antenna 98 August 30th 03 03:09 AM
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR intothesame... Richard Harrison Antenna 7 August 24th 03 01:45 AM
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? Dr. Slick Antenna 140 August 18th 03 08:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017