Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote: Why does this seem so complicated? The SWR bridge circuitry may not correctly display the actual SWR. Please see my latest response to Tarmo. The SWR bridge samples the current and voltage and performs a phasor addition and subtraction to get voltages proportional to the forward and reflected powers. If there is a high voltage caused by reactive components, it will be close to 90 degrees away from the current. But phasor adding these two values gives something slightly greater in magnitude than the high reactive voltage. That high voltage gets rectified and displayed as the forward power when it is not actually the forward power but reactive power flowing from one reactance to another. Even in this unusual situation, the behavior of the meter is completely predictable, including the incorrect power indication. Remember that the meter doesn't actually measure power - it is only *calibrated* to *indicate* power. When placed in a situation where its calibration is not valid, then of course it won't indicate power correctly. But even its wrong indication can be predicted if you know the detailed values to plug into a circuit model. There's really no mystery about it. -- 73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book' http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|