Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
V.F.=.64 does seem a bit low, but if it's the type of line where the
wires are very close together, embedded in thick, solid polyethylene, it's not too far out of line. It's easier to get a good short than a good open, because of fringing effects, but the error from that should be very tiny with small line at that frequency. If your analyzer finds high impedance, too, try shorting the other end of the line and see if you get the same result. Or look for a half-wave reflection of the short back to a near-short again. Also, check the analyzer with a physical short right at the analyzer. Is the analyzer for unbalanced lines? If so, see if a simple ferrite bead choke balun on the line at the analyzer makes a difference in the measurement. Cheers, Tom (Richard) wrote in message . com... What would be the best way to adjust a quarter wave of 75 Ohm twin line using an antenna analyser? I just connected mine across the analyser (open circuit) and looked for the freq where a short showed - is that likely to be accurate? At 10.1 MHZ I ended up with a 15.7 foot line which seems a bit short (low velocity factor). 73 Richard G3CWI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Complex line Z0: A numerical example | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |