| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#17
October 11th 03, 04:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Clark wrote in message . ..
On 10 Oct 2003 19:55:02 -0700, (Art Unwin KB9MZ) wrote: I then reason that with energy being applied to the loop it will also create oscillation Hi Art, The term is resonation, not oscillation. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Richard, At my stage of life where death would beat a formal education one must resort to individual thinking,after all the exclamation of Eureka came from a man in a bath and not from a studying classroom tho the latter is a more consistant way to succecces. There in my case is it not unexpected that reasoning and thus nomenclature would be different from the regimented norm. You may remember that I once referred to radio waves as pulses ( it generated mirth) because I saw the current curve as starting from zero and ending at zero where the regimented term that the current goes THRU zero and thus is a wave. I submit that both are correct. In a similar way an electrical engineer may well look at a leaking tap as a continuoes leak while another may see the results as a series of pulses as shown by the continous sccesion of pulses. Roy used a mechanical action to bolster his case against mine while J.H.Morecraft uses similar analogy to to bolster his case * If one does not strive to understand INTENT then learning and understanding is thrown away in favour of debate. A similar aproach was taken when I tried to describe my antenna which is nothing more than a T section plus tuner but engineered backward to form a number of complex circuits where lumped circuits can be divided up into lumped and distributed components and thus negate the need for a serparate tuner while attaining high radiation efficiency, this again is an example of individual thinking and manipulating the known via unconventional thinking which was thrown out by those educated under the normal format. and different nomenclature which thru out understandings and evolved into debate. So yes, my terms may be different but thinking and understanding should not be thrown out because of lack of conformity. So I must ask you to give some leeway to me and strive to understand intent Regards Art * Principles of Radio Communication Second Edition With special reference to The laws of oscillating circuits/ currents in coupled circuits,chapter 111 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Slingshot method for hanging a wire antenna. | Antenna | |||
| WTB: 2" spreaders for open wire line | Antenna | |||
| 2 Meter Wire Antenna | Antenna | |||
| Opinions please G5 against long wire against windom? | Antenna | |||
| Feedpoint impedence / wire diameter | Antenna | |||
Threaded Mode
