Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dr. Slick wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote in message ... .. . . I see your point, that the primary could be considered one antenna, and the core material like free space, and the secondary would be the receive antenna. But i suspect even a single transducer/antenna can be optimized for maximum lines of flux through a core at a particular frequency, or max ERP in the case of the antenna. Otherwise we wouldn't have to tune these things. Yep, and an automobile can be optimized for maximum acceleration. Good argument for considering an antenna a type of automobile, no? Y'see, if you really, really want an antenna to be a kind of automobile, you can cook up a bunch of reasons to convince yourself that it is. The same method works for astrology and fortune telling, too. Shall i call this a Straw man argument? Or putting words in someone's mouth? Feel free to call it what you want. I believe I've made as valid an argument for an antenna being an automobile as you did for it being a transformer, and based on the same criteria. Ok, an antenna is a transducer. But you can still optimize it for ERP, and that will depend on the impedance of free space or water or whatever. Why not throw out the whole concept of free space impedance if it doesn't matter? The optimization of an antenna depends on many factors, only one of which is the nature of the medium in which it's immersed. And among the medium's important properties are its permeability, permittivity, and the velocity of a wave propagating in it. The phase velocity and characteristic impedance can both be calculated from the permeability and permittivity, so you can't really say any one of these is more important than the other. It doesn't make any sense to throw out the concept of free space impedance just because it confuses people who don't know what it means. It's an extremely useful and well-understood concept. For example, reflection of a wave from a plane conductor or the ground can easily be found by calculating a reflection coefficient based on the impedance of the reflecting surface and the impedance of the impinging wave. (The impedance of a wave can be quite different close to an antenna than it is after it's traveled some distance.) If you look in some of those texts I recommended, you'll find the impedance of free space cropping up all over the place. What needs to be thrown away is the belief that all impedances are the ratio of a voltage to a current, along with the notion that only resistors can have resistance. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Conservation of Energy | Antenna |