| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ian White, G3SEK wrote:
You are using that principle of impedance substitution whenever you calibrate your antenna impedance bridge using known values of resistORS, capacitORS and inductORS. Yes, but I comprehend what I am doing. For you to imply the "electrical properties don't change" between a 50 ohm dummy load and a 50 ohm dipole antenna is simply ridiculous. That whole principle relies on the fact that, at the same frequency and in the steady state, the "definition of impedance" in terms of its electrical properties does *not* change. That's the whole point. The electrical properties *can* change and that's the whole point. The electrical properties of a 50+j0 dummy load and a 50+j0 antenna are almost completely different. A transmission line can transfer photons. Can a lumped constant L-C model transfer photons? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Conservation of Energy | Antenna | |||