| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
W5DXP wrote:
Ian White, G3SEK wrote: You are using that principle of impedance substitution whenever you calibrate your antenna impedance bridge using known values of resistORS, capacitORS and inductORS. Yes, but I comprehend what I am doing. For you to imply the "electrical properties don't change" between a 50 ohm dummy load and a 50 ohm dipole antenna is simply ridiculous. I didn't either say that or imply it. What's truly "ridiculous" is for you to *infer* that I did. I think I've already made my points well enough for other readers to judge, so I really am done this time. No doubt you'll have the last word, Cecil. Use it well. -- 73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book' http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Conservation of Energy | Antenna | |||