![]() |
|
In article , Mike Coslo
wrote: From experience with a lot of AOL users, their decision will sit very well with a lot of newsgroup regulars! 8^) I second the above, and wish to add, "don't let the keyboard hit you in the butt on your way out of the Usenet system........" "couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of folks........" "austa Lavista BABY........." Now if we could get the WebTver's to do the same thing........ Me |
;-) If it bugs you, change it!
|
Yep, AOL screwed it with charging for ham ads, they faded away. Now they are
trying to get rid of NG - stupid. If it is not very busy so what's the problem? If they kill NG, maybe time to change. Too much lib bias at AOL anyway. Yuri, K3BU.us |
If AOL had dropped newsgroups in May of 1997, we might have avoided the
Fraudtenna Follies. |
If AOL had dropped newsgroups in May of 1997, we might have avoided the
Fraudtenna Follies altogether. |
Bill wrote:
If AOL had dropped newsgroups in May of 1997, we might have avoided the Fraudtenna Follies. Yah but look at all the fun that would have been missed..... |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:25 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com