Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Coslo wrote:
Perhaps there is confusion by some people with the idea that the takeoff angle. I suspect that a lot of people think of their RF leaving the antenna as a "blob" that leaps out at some desired or undesired angle. Instead, the RF is heading off in all directions, with some angles having more relative power. So even if an antenna has a lower TOA, it might be less gain than an antenna that has a higher TOA has at that angle. An inefficient antenna with a low TOA can be less efficient at that low TOA than a more efficient antenna with a higher TOA is at that same low TOA. Maybe a picture is worth a thousand words. Here's a comparison radiation pattern for my 130 ft dipole Vs my 40m vertical with elevated radials. In the dipole's favored direction, it's TOA is greater than the vertical's yet the dipole radiates more power than the vertical even at the vertical's TOA. Here's the pictu http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/dipvsver.htm -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antenna tuner | Antenna | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | General | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | Policy | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy |