Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() J. Mc Laughlin wrote: Dear MK (NM5K): I do not understand. Why speculate? In the over forty years that I have been involved with the prediction of HF propagation, huge progress has transpired in the ease with which one may investigate the issues that seem to be of interest. I'm not sure I understand. Why speculate about what? Verticals vs dipoles? Or do you mean propagation only? Or you talking about qround quality per a certain area? Today, one may download and run a series of computer programs that will provide statistically significant answers to your questions. The programs have evolved over decades and are refined. Go to: http://elbert.its.bldrdoc.gov/hf.html As Reg might say: ready to run. Numbers tell the story. Enjoy. Tell what story? I might try downloading them, but what is it I'm trying to find out? What are my questions? I'm not overly keen on downloading a potentially large program, I then have to install, and take up more room, without knowing what it is I want to do with it, or even what it does... You are leaving me in the dark too much as to what this program does...Even they don't give a real description.. MK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antenna tuner | Antenna | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | General | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | Policy | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy |