Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg, G4FGQ wrote:
"Richard, If you got this off Terman and Kraus then Terman and Kraus are a couple of the oldest of old wives." I can`t blame them because I wrote without consulting them first. Terman does in fact say about what I said. I haven`t checked with Kraus yet. In his 1955 edition on page 921 Terman writes: "The second possible way to achieve broad-band characteristics consists in starting with a resonant antenna (as opposed to a rhombic for example), but so proportioning this antenna as to minimize resonance effects. Thus a resonant antenna employing a thin wire is equivalent to a moderately high Q system and so has a relatively narrow frequency band. However, if the diameter of the antenna is made large, the effective Q is very substantially reduced with resulting increase in bandwidth." Best regards, Richard Haarrison, KB5WZI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Shortwave | |||
Homebrew dipole help please? | Boatanchors | |||
40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet | Antenna |