Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old February 4th 05, 02:13 PM
jason
 
Posts: n/a
Default IP3

Hello All

I am beginner in RF
I may ask about some silly question and please pardon me
May I know what actually the unit of dbm and db is different from one
another?
If they are different how can we minus the gain in unit of db from a
IP3 in unit of dbm?
Kindly enlighthen
Thank you all


rgds and thanks
Jason

  #2   Report Post  
Old February 4th 05, 03:08 PM
Dave
 
Posts: n/a
Default

db is a generic term basically meaning: Decibel. A unit for measuring the
relative strength of a signal. Usually expressed as the logarithmic ratio of
the strength of a transmitted signal to the strength of the original signal.
A decibel is one tenth of a "bel".

the key is that it is a ratio... without a reference a ratio is essentially
meaningless. that is why you often hear that station a is 10db louder than
station b... saying that station a was 10db wouldn't mean anything.

dbm has a built in reference. by definition: Decibels referred to 1
milliwatt.
so the reference is 1 mw. do you can say that the power of a source is 0dbm
meaning that it is 1mw, 10dbm is 10mw, 20dbm is 100mw, -10dbm is .1mw, -20db
is .01mw, etc.

i don't know an ip3, but maybe that will give you a start to know what you
are looking for.



"jason" wrote in message
ups.com...
Hello All

I am beginner in RF
I may ask about some silly question and please pardon me
May I know what actually the unit of dbm and db is different from one
another?
If they are different how can we minus the gain in unit of db from a
IP3 in unit of dbm?
Kindly enlighthen
Thank you all


rgds and thanks
Jason



  #3   Report Post  
Old February 4th 05, 04:19 PM
Caveat Lector
 
Posts: n/a
Default

dB is a ratio for example dB = 10 log10 (P1/P2)
so increasing power from 100 watts to 200 watts is 3 dB (3.01dB actually)
But so is increasing power from 10 watts to 20 watts = 3dB
Since it is a ratio -- it is unitless

dBm is referenced to one milliwatt thus is a discrete power level

In the equation above P2 is always one milliwatt

Thus increasing power from 1 milliwatt to 2 milliwatts is 3dBm
From 1 milliwatt to 10 milliwatts is 10dBm etc

Not sure of your reference to ip3 but suspect you mean input third order
intercept point as used in amplifiers
Google ip3 to get explanations of this and how it is measured.
--
Caveat Lector (Reader Beware)


"jason" wrote in message
ups.com...
Hello All

I am beginner in RF
I may ask about some silly question and please pardon me
May I know what actually the unit of dbm and db is different from one
another?
If they are different how can we minus the gain in unit of db from a
IP3 in unit of dbm?
Kindly enlighthen
Thank you all


rgds and thanks
Jason





  #4   Report Post  
Old February 4th 05, 06:07 PM
Richard Fry
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Caveat Lector" wrote
dB is a ratio for example dB = 10 log10 (P1/P2)

....snip...
In the equation above P2 is always one milliwatt

___________________

To elaborate, P2 above must be 1 mW only if one wants to calculate dBm.

The equation as it is written above will calculate the relationship in
decibels between any two power values expressed in the same units. For
example, to find the gain of an amplifier in decibels when its input power
is 50 watts and its output power is 1.2 kW:

dB = 10*log(1200/50) = 10*log(24) = 10*1.38 = 13.8

RF



  #5   Report Post  
Old February 4th 05, 06:22 PM
Caveat Lector
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks for the clarification

I meant to say "For dbm In the equation above P2 is always one milliwatt"

Thanks

--
Caveat Lector (Reader Beware)



"Richard Fry" wrote in message
...
"Caveat Lector" wrote
dB is a ratio for example dB = 10 log10 (P1/P2)

...snip...
In the equation above P2 is always one milliwatt

___________________

To elaborate, P2 above must be 1 mW only if one wants to calculate dBm.

The equation as it is written above will calculate the relationship in
decibels between any two power values expressed in the same units. For
example, to find the gain of an amplifier in decibels when its input power
is 50 watts and its output power is 1.2 kW:

dB = 10*log(1200/50) = 10*log(24) = 10*1.38 = 13.8

RF







  #6   Report Post  
Old February 4th 05, 03:18 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

jason wrote:
I may ask about some silly question and please pardon me
May I know what actually the unit of dbm and db is different from one
another?


dBm is referenced to a milliwatt. dB is referenced to
something else and that something else must be specified.
dBd is referenced to a dipole. A web search for "decibel"
uncovered 100 dB of information.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #7   Report Post  
Old February 4th 05, 05:19 PM
Jim - NN7K
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cecil is CORRECT, also, other terms you might run into a

dB I = dB Isotropic (an immaginary point source that radiates
in all directions uniformly) , used for antennas.

dB W = dB, gain or loss , referenced to 1 Watt.

dB is simply the logrithmic ratio of (POWER, Voltage) to
the reference (-1 dB = a loss of 1/10 of your power, -3 dB ,
loss of 1/2 your power, and if positive, the opposite is true
1 dB = 10% power gain, 3 dB = twice the power, ect.
as info, Jim NN7K

Cecil Moore wrote:
jason wrote:

I may ask about some silly question and please pardon me
May I know what actually the unit of dbm and db is different from one
another?



dBm is referenced to a milliwatt. dB is referenced to
something else and that something else must be specified.
dBd is referenced to a dipole. A web search for "decibel"
uncovered 100 dB of information.

  #8   Report Post  
Old February 4th 05, 06:08 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 17:19:29 GMT, Jim - NN7K
wrote:
Cecil is CORRECT
A web search for "decibel" uncovered 100 dB of information.


Hi Jim,

I must've missed something here with this dimensionless, referenceless
declaration. I'm not even sure if there isn't an implicit negative
sign to it.

Would this be 100dB above ignorance? 100dB below genius? What is the
zero reference for information? Valid information, and simply
available information is not exchanged at the same rate (100dB above
entropy?). It can't be zero information because that would cause the
computation to be "undefined." Hmmm, maybe the baseline is the
computation of no information. -No- That returns us to the conundrum
of even what is 1dB above "undefined?" SWAG? In that regard:
A web search for "decibel" uncovered 100 dB of information re SWAG


Can there be a ratio of 1 SWAG : 10¹º Facts? When I enter the
universal measure of knowledge into Google, it only returns
"19,400,000 for TITS." This is roughly 500 times below the
declaration made above. Does it follow you must perform 500 SWAGs to
successfully achieve your goal of TITS? This sounds almost about the
same as the computation of probability for a teenage boy on a date
running out of gas on a dark road - and yet historically this occurs
far more often than chance.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #9   Report Post  
Old February 4th 05, 06:31 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Richard Clark wrote:

Jim - NN7K wrote:
Cecil is CORRECT
A web search for "decibel" uncovered 100 dB of information.


Would this be 100dB above ignorance? 100dB below genius?


100 dB compared to the answers one gets on a newsgroup. :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #10   Report Post  
Old February 5th 05, 04:19 PM
Airy R.Bean
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It's just a continuation of humorous electrical loose-talk.
For example. no change to anything, such as moving
all the gear around in the shack, is worthwhile
unless it produces a "3dB Improvement"

"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 17:19:29 GMT, Jim - NN7K
wrote:
Cecil is CORRECT
A web search for "decibel" uncovered 100 dB of information.


I must've missed something here with this dimensionless, referenceless
declaration. I'm not even sure if there isn't an implicit negative
sign to it.





Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017