Richard,

Sorry about the triple. I was so caught up in the excitement (constant
throughout all time) of your message I just couldn't stop.

Quote:

"After having done a quite rigorous contract with HP deeply involved in
both the strict math and the mechanics of Fourier, I am well versed to
know how not all Fourier Transforms offer equal outcomes - especially
with, or without D.C. as a product.

Pure Fourier mandates a waveform constant throughout all time (from
its inception to its end)"


I can ignore the name-dropping, but I cannot ignore the incorrect
statement about "Pure Fourier". There is no mandate of constancy even
for the purest Fourier transform. The function needs only to be
moderately well-behaved, including single valued and integrable.

Perhaps you are confusing Fourier series analysis with Fourier transform
analysis?

(By the way, for any of the lurkers out there, I did not say a word
about "DC". That is a trivial matter subject only to one's choice of
wording. There is no apparent disagreement on the reality, only the
description.)


73,
Gene
W4SZ


Richard Clark wrote:
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 21:58:05 GMT, Gene Fuller
wrote:


Utter nonsense.


Hi Gene,

You had to post that three times?

Oh well, seems the season for deeply insightful criticism that appears
to be following the value of the dollar in the world market. Was that
your 1½¢ worth?

Barring any discussion of conflicting experience, I would say it was
worth every penny. You can put it into a privatized SS account and
recoup massive earnings - if the dollar would just tread water. Don't
invest in cotton or rice futures though.... [Feb. 5 - President Bush
will seek deep cuts in farm and commodity programs in his new budget]

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC