RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Antenna (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/)
-   -   SUPER J-POLE BEATS YAGI BY 1 dB (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/63759-super-j-pole-beats-yagi-1-db.html)

Richard Clark February 9th 05 05:38 AM

On 8 Feb 2005 19:01:01 -0800, wrote:

Just because i build transmitters, don't mean
i encourage people to use radiating loads with them!

Just encourage them to buy expensive toasters, hmmm?

[email protected] February 9th 05 10:11 AM


Cecil Moore wrote:
wrote:
Radio Free Los Gatos doesn't exist anymore, but thanks
for bringing up good memories!


Remember KFAT? "The Free Mexican Air Force"?
Those were the days.
--
73, Cecil
http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


How about KPIG, which indeed started out
as a pirate station?


S.


[email protected] February 9th 05 10:11 AM


Cecil Moore wrote:
wrote:
Radio Free Los Gatos doesn't exist anymore, but thanks
for bringing up good memories!


Remember KFAT? "The Free Mexican Air Force"?
Those were the days.
--
73, Cecil
http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


How about KPIG, which indeed started out
as a pirate station?


S.


[email protected] February 9th 05 10:16 AM


Richard Clark wrote:
On 8 Feb 2005 19:01:01 -0800, wrote:

Just because i build transmitters, don't mean
i encourage people to use radiating loads with them!

Just encourage them to buy expensive toasters, hmmm?



Toasters? No, you mean bed-warmers!

So basically, i sell bed-warmers for
the furtherance of one's knowledge of
FM broadcast electronics.

For the future I plan on marketing an
excellent line of specially shaped dummy-loads
that can accept a coffee mug on the top,
for keeping your coffee warm all day!

Heehee!

:^)


Slick


Cecil Moore February 9th 05 02:50 PM

wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
Remember KFAT? "The Free Mexican Air Force"?
Those were the days.


How about KPIG, which indeed started out
as a pirate station?


Search results:
KPIG remembers KFAT [New Window]
http://www.kfat.com/kfat.html
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[email protected] February 9th 05 03:56 PM

On 8 Feb 2005 19:05:06 -0800, wrote:

wrote:

2 bays is big and heavy enough! 4 would be
a bit overkill in this situation.


Definitely! You try putting up a VHF
Super J-pole yourself! You are probably
more used to UHF, so 4 bays doesn't scare
you, but at the broadcast band, you will need
some serious help.


I have done both the super J-pole and 4 bays of Dipole
at both UHF and VHF. I've also tested the result with far better
hardware than you have. Beside being a ham I'm also commercial
licensed and have an extensive radio lab.

I would love to see what a 4 bay
would do though, but you need serious
bucks to do that, plus alot of manual
labor...


Your kidding right? I figure using both 1" copper water pipe, 1/2"
copper pipe and the various fittings to be cheap. How cheap?
Likely if you spent 50$us you spent too much for your materials.

He doesn't explicitely say brass in
his website, and looking at the picture, it
looks like a cheapie SO-239 made of pot metal.


Looks aren't everything. Also potmetal is not solderable
and his was. I'm normal so I have to test with a file to know
what material the connector is. I can never tell from picture.

It's a bad idea overall. I would
mount it with 4-40 nuts and bolts on
an aluminum plate, and then attach
that to the antenna.


You can but, you are making work thats not required
and you run into dissimilar metal electrolytic corrosion
and plain old rust. Water intrusion is the death of coax
most often. I've worked in marine environments
(salt is corrsive) so I have seen what works. Buy a
decent waterproof connector. I'd say Type N if your
really fussy.

I've had to take an antenna
down before, just to replace the
broken SO-239 that i used in this
way. Bad idea. You have to make
your antenna very physically strong,
unless you like to spend a lot of time
on your rooftop.


Mine have spend years on a real tower, roofs and other sometimes more
difficult places to reach. I don't like height so if I put it up
it's staying.

Yep, 3:1. Use light metal. Though using 1/2 inch copper is not as
heavy as it may seem as it's also structural. I have built them for
VHF too.


1/2" copper gets heavy with 2 bays, trust me.


Ah yes, you know all. Some day I"ll post a picture of the antenna
farm both UHF and VHF. Never minding the ones I've given away.
I know what type M and type L 1/2inch copper pipe weigh, do you?

Two bays would use approximately:

6 19" lengths of 1/2" copper (less than 5$)
4 1/2 inch pipe caps (usually less than 20 cents each)
1 10ft length (partial) of 3/4 copper water pipe for the mast (Runs
about 8$ last I paid for one)
2 1/2 inch tees ( 79 cents)
2 3/4" to 1/2" tees ( $1.49 expensive ones).

This is under 12 pounds and is self supporting to that height.
Plenty light enough for this girl. You could use Aluminum tube
to build this and really cut the weight.

Especially for something like the Super J.


Since the super-j doesnt offer the same performance your
claim is specious. As to structural, The super-J often fails
badly at the center insulator and the phasing loop as descrbed often
rarely makes the winter here in the east due to ice, wind and
snow. New England winters are harsh on antennas.

I also have a standard copper cactus Jpole for 6m/2m/70cm (it's only
14 ft tall) made with 1", 3/4" and 1/2 inch coppper. A really robust
antenna.

The rules are simple. Want more signal, put up more metal.

Or want more ERP, or a lower angle of radiation, put up more metal.


Same rules. If you understood antennas you'd know you do not get
increased ERP (or the reciprical, more signal) without concentrating
the RF field. Simply said, to do that requires more metal.


Allison

[email protected] February 9th 05 04:18 PM

On 8 Feb 2005 18:49:05 -0800, wrote:

+1 dB was what our theoretical
difference was, but it may have been more.


First the average reciever will not see the differnce unless right at
the threshold of detection (MDS). The only place I've seen a 1db
difference that was detectable is in really weak signal systems.
In those systems the 1DB differnce cosses the threshold from just
noise to marginally detectable. Such as EME or my favortie mode
troposcatter.

The average FM broadcast system TX and RX runs at high power because
the average FM rx has limited sensitvity due to the required wide
bandwidth. Those recievers require a much larger signals to hit an
acceptable signal to noise and rarely can differentiate between
a 1db difference.

Sorry, but we don't have a huge VHF anechoic
chamber, and the proper signal strength meter
to do this properly!


Measuring 1db difference does not require all of that. As to a
propper field strength meter, specify a brand. They are not rocket
science and are easy to build. If you really want to see something
attend a Central states VHF society antenna gain test. They usually
hit .1db or better accuracy and have tested Jpoles. The results of
past years are posted at their site.

http://www.csvhfs.org/CSVHFANT.HTML

I'll point you to the 2004 results and specifically to the 144mhz
section where a Jpole entered scored a -2.8db gain compared to
a reference dipole (0db)

These things are easily tested and easy to verify. If your trying
to resolve to bettern than .1DB that may be harder but,
3DB is easy and tends to jump at you.


Allison


Richard Clark February 9th 05 05:17 PM

On 9 Feb 2005 02:16:27 -0800, wrote:
So basically, i sell bed-warmers

I'm sure some of your customers agree - the population that has
survived the first self thinning of the genetic pool :-)

And your antennas? I suppose they are probes for warming delicate
tissues?

One can tell by your mien that you must really love your customers.
That crew of pirates must love barrel duty.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

[email protected] February 9th 05 05:42 PM


wrote:

Definitely! You try putting up a VHF
Super J-pole yourself! You are probably
more used to UHF, so 4 bays doesn't scare
you, but at the broadcast band, you will need
some serious help.


I have done both the super J-pole and 4 bays of Dipole
at both UHF and VHF. I've also tested the result with far better
hardware than you have. Beside being a ham I'm also commercial
licensed and have an extensive radio lab.


What brand and model # field strength
meter do you have? Or did you build a
homemade RF rectifying "sniffer" amplified
with an Op-amp? Not saying the later
couldn't be calibrated correctly...



I would love to see what a 4 bay
would do though, but you need serious
bucks to do that, plus alot of manual
labor...


Your kidding right? I figure using both 1" copper water pipe, 1/2"
copper pipe and the various fittings to be cheap. How cheap?
Likely if you spent 50$us you spent too much for your materials.


Yeah, but you need a serious tower
to put 4 bays on, esp. at VHF, which we don't have
the money for.




He doesn't explicitely say brass in
his website, and looking at the picture, it
looks like a cheapie SO-239 made of pot metal.


Looks aren't everything. Also potmetal is not solderable
and his was. I'm normal so I have to test with a file to know
what material the connector is. I can never tell from picture.


He should explicitely state that it
should be made of brass.

Also, solder has VERY little
mechanical strength. Almost none.

It's a bad idea.



It's a bad idea overall. I would
mount it with 4-40 nuts and bolts on
an aluminum plate, and then attach
that to the antenna.


You can but, you are making work thats not required
and you run into dissimilar metal electrolytic corrosion
and plain old rust. Water intrusion is the death of coax
most often. I've worked in marine environments
(salt is corrsive) so I have seen what works. Buy a
decent waterproof connector. I'd say Type N if your
really fussy.


You're correct on this one:

http://www.ssina.com/galvanic/

So then use a brass plate, and
stainless-steel 4-40 bolts and nuts.

But don't rely on solder and the
corner of an SO-239 for strength.




Ah yes, you know all. Some day I"ll post a picture of the antenna
farm both UHF and VHF. Never minding the ones I've given away.
I know what type M and type L 1/2inch copper pipe weigh, do you?

Two bays would use approximately:

6 19" lengths of 1/2" copper (less than 5$)
4 1/2 inch pipe caps (usually less than 20 cents each)
1 10ft length (partial) of 3/4 copper water pipe for the mast

(Runs
about 8$ last I paid for one)
2 1/2 inch tees ( 79 cents)
2 3/4" to 1/2" tees ( $1.49 expensive ones).

This is under 12 pounds and is self supporting to that height.
Plenty light enough for this girl. You could use Aluminum tube
to build this and really cut the weight.


Opps! I meant to say 1" copper. 1/2" copper
is not strong enough for a VHF super J-pole.

Aluminum is not solderable.

The Super J-pole at VHF is big, and
it's worse depending on how high you want
to get it.




Especially for something like the Super J.


Since the super-j doesnt offer the same performance your
claim is specious. As to structural, The super-J often fails
badly at the center insulator and the phasing loop as descrbed often
rarely makes the winter here in the east due to ice, wind and
snow. New England winters are harsh on antennas.


We used a length of Delrin rod for the center
conductor, it's slightly flexible but ultra strong.
Don't use a wooden dowel coated w/epoxy, it will break.

The phasing loop was something like AWG#4
solid copper wire. Hasn't failed for 3 years,
but Ca. is a bit less harsh, indeed!


Slick


[email protected] February 9th 05 05:49 PM


wrote:
On 8 Feb 2005 18:49:05 -0800,
wrote:

+1 dB was what our theoretical
difference was, but it may have been more.


First the average reciever will not see the differnce unless right at
the threshold of detection (MDS). The only place I've seen a 1db
difference that was detectable is in really weak signal systems.
In those systems the 1DB differnce cosses the threshold from just
noise to marginally detectable. Such as EME or my favortie mode
troposcatter.

The average FM broadcast system TX and RX runs at high power because
the average FM rx has limited sensitvity due to the required wide
bandwidth. Those recievers require a much larger signals to hit an
acceptable signal to noise and rarely can differentiate between
a 1db difference.


Then we agree. Most listeners
will not notice a 1dB difference.




These things are easily tested and easy to verify. If your trying
to resolve to bettern than .1DB that may be harder but,
3DB is easy and tends to jump at you.


3 dB? 100 watts versus 50?

Yeah, I should hope so!



Slick



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com