| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#3
February 14th 05, 07:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
"Glenn" wrote in message news:luTPd.8673$Ps.7054@okepread06... "Charlie" wrote in message ... The HIGHER the BETTER !!!! That's always been the rule on VHF/UHF. 73 de Glenn AA5PK UNLESS you're working through repeaters and live in the valleys of a mountainous area. Then you're working bounces and if you get too high (high off the ground, but not as high as the hilltops around you), you can get up out of the signal. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Modifying KL-40 for higher input | Homebrew | |||
| Can 2.4 ghz (or higher) wireless phones be monitored? | Scanner | |||
| Damping Higher Harmonics on a parallel LC-Oscillator? (1 port Low-, High-, Bandpasses?) | Homebrew | |||
| Damping Higher Harmonics on a parallel LC-Oscillator? (1 port Low-, High-, Bandpasses?) | Homebrew | |||
| Good night for higher frequencies? | Shortwave | |||
Threaded Mode
