![]() |
HF Loop Antennas
Is a loop antenna a way to get a "long" antenna in limited space? I am
having a hard time finding detailed information on loop antennas. I have seen some references to using a long wire, but making several loops which requires much less space. And the second question is about feed lines. Could I connect 450 ohm ladder line to the ends of the loop(s) and then run it to a balanced tuner in my shack? Most references I have seen about loop antennas talk about capacitors installed at the loop. Any insight will be appreciated. Thanks, jimbo |
On 19 Feb 2005 16:39:02 -0800, "jimbo" wrote:
Is a loop antenna a way to get a "long" antenna in limited space? I am having a hard time finding detailed information on loop antennas. I have seen some references to using a long wire, but making several loops which requires much less space. Hi OM, That is one way, but if you mean making several turns (loops?) the topic will become muddied by what is meant by "loops." And the second question is about feed lines. Could I connect 450 ohm ladder line to the ends of the loop(s) and then run it to a balanced tuner in my shack? Sure, no big deal, you run the same assortment of difficulties and benefits, just at different frequencies. Most references I have seen about loop antennas talk about capacitors installed at the loop. Ah! Now we are back in the mud of discussion. Those are SMALL loops. You know, like 1M across. So, to avoid further difficulties, just what size of a loop are you thinking? Loop OR dipole, offering the prospective size makes a considerable difference to the accuracy of responses. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thanks for your reply.
Well, for example, if I wanted a chance on 40-160 meters, I would need a fairly long dipole, maybe 80 feet on each "wing". But maybe a square "loop" with four turns only 10 feet on a side would also work? jimbo Richard Clark wrote: On 19 Feb 2005 16:39:02 -0800, "jimbo" wrote: Is a loop antenna a way to get a "long" antenna in limited space? I am having a hard time finding detailed information on loop antennas. I have seen some references to using a long wire, but making several loops which requires much less space. Hi OM, That is one way, but if you mean making several turns (loops?) the topic will become muddied by what is meant by "loops." And the second question is about feed lines. Could I connect 450 ohm ladder line to the ends of the loop(s) and then run it to a balanced tuner in my shack? Sure, no big deal, you run the same assortment of difficulties and benefits, just at different frequencies. Most references I have seen about loop antennas talk about capacitors installed at the loop. Ah! Now we are back in the mud of discussion. Those are SMALL loops. You know, like 1M across. So, to avoid further difficulties, just what size of a loop are you thinking? Loop OR dipole, offering the prospective size makes a considerable difference to the accuracy of responses. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
On 19 Feb 2005 17:33:29 -0800, "jimbo" wrote:
Well, for example, if I wanted a chance on 40-160 meters, I would need a fairly long dipole, maybe 80 feet on each "wing". But maybe a square "loop" with four turns only 10 feet on a side would also work? Hi OM, Anything will work, if only to boil an egg. Your problem with a small loop (and for 160M this so constitutes one) is in the proportion of losses. If you do your absolute best, you may enjoy 20dB down from a full size design. If you do better, the loss may not be that bad. Nearly every successful 160M design that has been crowed about here was a vertical. Efficiency is correlated to area, not windings. We've had design contests here in attempts to crush as much wire into the smallest footprint to achieve parity with a full size design. As I recall, a half sized antenna was about as good as it got before you went over the cliff of diminishing returns. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
jimbo wrote:
Well, for example, if I wanted a chance on 40-160 meters, I would need a fairly long dipole, maybe 80 feet on each "wing". But maybe a square "loop" with four turns only 10 feet on a side would also work? Single turn loops are more popular than multi-turn loops because they are more efficient. Small loops are about 0.1 wavelength long usually resonated with a vacuum capacitor. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Small transmitting loops can work fairly well above a few MHz, but they
are expensive to make. They need very low loss (because the radiation resistance is almost nil) and a very high-voltage (10's of kV) motor-driven capacitor arrangement. You can easily buy them commercially covering 10 MHz - 30 MHz. They are an option if you don't have space for a large antenna, don't mind shelling-out $380+ bucks, and don't mind re-tuning whenever you change operating frequency. I understand the H-fields are huge close-in, so one needs to be careful. 73 -JJ |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:40 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com