LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old February 28th 05, 07:49 AM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 06:28:24 GMT, "George, W5YR"
wrote:

IF the Thevenin source approach worked, we would have to be content with max
50% efficient amplifiers. We know we can do better than that substantially.


Hi George,

I know you won't appreciate this, but it is a telling, simple test of
a practical situation with a practical Amateur grade transistor model
100W transmitter commonly available for more than 20-30 years now:
1. Presuming CW mode into a "matched load" (any definition will do);
2. Report the DC power consumed before hitting the key;
3. Report the DC power consumed while holding the key.

Concurrently note:
A. Report Heat Sink Temperature for a previously idle/rcv condition;
B. Report Heat Sink Temperature after 10 minute key-down.

For a hypothetical "100W" model (again, a contemporary, common example
for Amateur use) available through standard commercial venues:
2. About 20W - 30W
3. About 200W - 250W
A. About 20 degrees C (or room temperature)
B. Well above 37 degrees C (or skin temperature)

Now, if we are to be any judge of efficiency (Thevenin does not have
to be invoked, condemned, or venerated); then it runs close to 50%
(±10%). Others can invoke their favorite deity to explain.

Now, if we are to be any judge of dissipation (no requirement for
advanced degree); then heat as a loss by virtue of less than 100%
efficiency is quite evident. Others can invoke photons to describe
why.

To forestall any armchair engineers, yes, this efficiency is System
efficiency. However, I would be surprised if a practical common
Amateur grade transistor model transmitter commonly available for more
than 20-30 years now has any configuration that does not apply supply
voltage directly to the final transistors; and instead adds a
significant current path outside of this load (citations to available
schematics would be compelling, but any argument without this would be
speculation). It takes very little effort to subtract out the power
drain of the receive mode (being very representative of the similar
power demand of supporting circuitry for transmit up to the driver
stage). Barring such amazing evidence of a significant power drain
not found in the finals, it follows that a simple computation of
efficiency has its merit and has been met.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discone antenna plans [email protected] Antenna 13 January 14th 05 11:51 PM
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} RHF Antenna 27 November 3rd 04 01:38 PM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Shortwave 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM
X-terminator antenna (Scott Unit 69) CB 77 October 29th 03 01:52 AM
Outdoor Antenna and lack of intermod Soliloquy Scanner 11 October 11th 03 01:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017