Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 18:06:18 GMT, gwhite wrote:
It is about DC to RF efficiency, Put a number to it. as I've been pointing out since my first post, and which you initially commented was "nonsense" Hi OM, And so it remains with additional elaborations not quoted here. but now seem to agree with. Seeming is a rather insubstantial thing to hang your theories on. "Impedance matching" meant in the normal sense of conjugate matching for maximum transfer of power And this reveals the error of "Seeming" because the so-called meaning you ascribe is this same nonsense. Pay more attention to reading instead of writing. It has been pointed out more than once, and by several, that Matching comes under many headings. The most frequent violation is the mixing of concepts and specifications (your text is littered with such clashes). is a misapplied small signal concept/model. I think that is all I've really been saying. And I preserved this clash quoted above as an example. If there is any misapplication, you brought it to the table with this forced presumption. The misapplication of S parameters to a large signal amplifier is one thing, to project this error backwards into the fictive theory that there is some difference between large and small signal BEHAVIOR (not modeling) is tailoring the argument to suit a poorly framed thesis. None of your dissertation reveals any practical substantiation, hence it falls into the realm of armchair theory. We get plenty of that embroidered with photonic wave theory that is far more amusing. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Discone antenna plans | Antenna | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave | |||
X-terminator antenna | CB | |||
Outdoor Antenna and lack of intermod | Scanner |