Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() As someone who is relatively inexperienced with the hobby, I am amazed at the confusion and mysticism surrounding the "G5RV" antenna. It appears to be nothing but a dipole, with a length of "balanced line" to transform the impedance to a better match for coax at certain frequencies. A little consideration reveals that this antenna should suffer from unwanted return currents unless a balun is used (like any coax-fed dipole), and substantial loss in the coax at certain frequencies. So why is this antenna better than two pieces of reasonably long wire driven with balanced line and a tuner? What am I missing? ============================ Well done! You are correct about the G5RV in every respect. As a multi-band HF antenna it is just another dipole without any magical properties. With the coax (Zo unspecified) its loss is greater than other dipoles. Its balanced feedline impedance Zo is not specified. This important performance parameter can be anything you like and the antenna will still remain a G5RV. It has an approximate impedance match at only one frequency, 14.15 MHz. You will be very lucky to find a resonance in any other band. The impedance match to coax at 14.15 MHz is not at the desirable 50 but 75 ohms. It has a cloverleaf radiation pattern only in the 20m band, sometimes praised as desirable if you work from South America into both Europe and the USA as G5RV often did. As with other balanced line fed dipoles a current or choke balun is best when converting impedance from a balanced line to a tuner plus 50-ohm transmitter. But the biggest joke of all is the half-size G5RV. Mr R L Varney must be turning over in his grave. ---- Reg, G4FGQ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
G5RV vs. G5RV Jr. | Antenna | |||
G5RV or 135 foot doublet or Carolina Windom? | Antenna | |||
G5RV is the closest you can go | Homebrew | |||
G5RV is the closest you can go | Homebrew | |||
Stupid question G5RV | Antenna |