Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 05:29:03 GMT, "
wrote: "Buck" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 05:41:29 GMT, " wrote: I have just come to realise that if one drew a polygon of element phases in a array and all elements were 180 degrees to its companion element and excluding the driven element, the max gain and max front to back will occur at the SAME frequency! Until now I was of the understanding that these two max figures could not occur at the same frequency. Is there anything written about this possibility? Regards Art Art, Your description is too vague for someone who doesn't have some form of reference (maybe this is a continuation of a discussion from elsewhere?) Anyway, since a polygon is any shape with more than two sides in which all sides and angles are equal, It does! then I have used the incorrect term. In a yagi type diagram you can calculate the current and phase of each elemrnt but what one is interested in is the summation of the whole array and you can do this in the same way as you would do a vector diagram of forces. With the yagi array you would first start with the reflector and draw to scale a line reflecting both phase angle and magnitude. You then add lines in cosecutive order for all other elements in the array. The end of this 'toe to tail' some what erratic line will finish up some distance from the starting point, but this distance, if drawn, represents the phase and magnitude of the array as a whole. As a former mechanical engineer I am not ... You may be using a term familiar to your trade and I am unfamiliar with. I would be a layman in respect ... that could be the misunderstanding. I was trying to envision the antenna you were describing... can you imagine what I was seeing in my mind? ![]() but now nothing ,I was taught the term "polygon of forces" which is a cumulative vector array but the shape did not necessarily consist of "equal "sides as you stated.. But then I am English born and it is known that Americans completely messed up the Elizabethan era language which a true cockney still adheres to , where as others in the same country have learned to talk in such a way it sounds as if they are trying to retain a marble in their mouth.without swallowing it. Actually, I like the UK accents. As I believe my misunderstanding has nothing to do with the queen's English, but rather techno-speak for your trade, I will pack up my octagon shaped array of dipole antennas and gracefully move on to another topic. Good luck and I'll catch you in another thread. Buck Regards Art -- 73 for now Buck N4PGW |