Oh come on Wes look at your last posting where you poked fun at the idea of
a polygon phasor array. And look at the other postings where it was obvious
that many were not familiar with the same and needed more direction. Look at
Roy,
he admitted he knows nothing about the subject
which when he next argues with the like of Cecil and others I will now have
to think twice instead of accepting his typical
riposte that he supplies. But I give Roy credit for being honest in the face
of personal embarassment regarding his lack of knoweledge
You say it was not necesary to provide a long convoluted pseudo treatise on
vectors but many asked for it and you made a joke of the idea,
Regarding front to rear occuring at the same frequency. An operator wants as
much gain as possible when communicating
so he does not need to resort to more power than needed. For best
communication it is nice to block of interference to the rear and thus he
needs best front to rear at the frequency of communication even tho it is of
interest that he had better rejection at a lower frequency. The fact of the
matter is that it is not the frequency being used, he has to live with a
lesser value of rejection, your opinion may well be different.

Now you also remarked that you do not want explanations, just the meat. I
gave what you call a "treatise" that explained the theoretical
underpinnings of what I have stated. It would be unwise at this point to
declare success without not only having a NEC model to confirm it but also a
20 meter antenna and not say a 144 meg equivalent. Today we had snow, wind
and rain so I could not complete the job.If by chance the antenna gives a
third aproval i.e.Nec model then polygon discussion plus the antenna then I
will forward it to RADCOM for peer review. It is at that time you can vent
your displeasure that you rejected my offer to share the actual mathematical
and physical findings. If you were looking for a way to undermine what I had
stated then my " treatise" now arms you with the knoweledge to disprove what
I have stated as it is one factor that convinces me of my origonal findings.
If you need more information regarding vectors I will be happy to aid you in
your quest
Regards
Art...KB9MZ....XG

"Wes Stewart" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:30:15 GMT, "
wrote:

Well we shall see Roy, but I find it hard to believe that you
with your antenna knoweledge plus being an engineer do
not understand vectors.

This in response to Roy's post that states in part:

"...but the reason I don't appreciate your ideas isn't because I don't
understand vectors."

[snip]


I am aware that to some I am a poor communicator,

Here is the problem, simply stated.


but I went out of
my way to clearly inform people on the subject of vectors and
carefully tied the subject back to my original post such that those
with a non science background can follow step by step the trend of
thought of my original posting.

We don't need a long convoluted pseudo treatise on vectors, give us
some raw meat that simply states what it is that you're trying to/are
doing.

And, I have to ask since it is the subject, why is necessary or
important to have max gain and F/B at the same frequency?