LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   Report Post  
Old March 7th 05, 08:01 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim Miller wrote:
Both halves of the doublet will be rather equally hidden in the woods.
The bend would result in the halves of the doublet departing from
nominal collinearity by about 5°. The droop on either side of the
feedpoint would be the same as any other center supported doublet. The
center support is there to relieve the doublet of the need to support
the weight of the feedline.


A 75% drop in radiated signal is approximately one S-unit.
How many S-units difference do you think a 5° difference
will make?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
88 ft + 66 ft fanned doublet? Ken Antenna 2 September 28th 04 02:01 PM
88 ft. Doublet Question Bert Craig Antenna 5 September 27th 04 09:55 PM
G5RV or 135 foot doublet or Carolina Windom? Jim Leder Antenna 3 May 22nd 04 03:43 PM
40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet Dick Antenna 2 February 6th 04 08:55 PM
Feeding a doublet Adrian Antenna 6 January 1st 04 07:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017