| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yuri Blanarovich wrote:
MEASURE or FEEL it! Or disprove what W5DXP is saying. This is easy to see using EZNEC. Model a 102' G5RV on 20m and look at the current distribution. There are three current maximums and four current minimums. If you install a loading coil at a current maximum or current minimum, the current magnitude will be the same on both sides of the coil. If you install a loading coil at a point where the slope of the current is negative (decreasing), the current at the bottom of the coil will be greater than the current at the top of the coil. This is the usual case for mobile antennas. If you install a loading coil at a point where the slope of the current is positive (increasing), the current at the bottom of the coil will be less than the current at the top of the coil. Note: 'Top' of coil is the end closest to the the ends of the antenna. 'Bottom' of coil is the end closest to the feedpoint. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
| Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna | |||