Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 09:26:05 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote: |Roy Lewallen wrote: | If you could build an antenna from | straight conductors and lumped inductors, the result would be very close | to EZNEC's predictions. | |Hard to prove since lumped inductors are impossible in reality. Why |does EZNEC show so much difference between lumped inductors and stub |inductors? I see no such difference in my model. |The difference in coils Vs stubs in reality is virtually |nill. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |