Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So, you've retracted your prediction. What's your new one, then?
Roy Lewallen, W7EL Cecil Moore wrote: Roy Lewallen wrote: I did read what you said. You said that it wouldn't exhibit a phase shift if placed at a current maximum. I'm sorry, there is a misunderstanding that is my fault. When I say "current is the same.", I'm implying magnitude only. That's a convention left over from my college days and may not be a convention any longer. If I said anything at all about phase, I used the word, "phase", in my posting. So I will stop omitting the word, "magnitude", when I am talking about magnitude. So do a system reset on what you think I said. There is always a phase shift through a real-world inductor. Whether it can be measured accurately is another matter. When I said: "If the current maximum point is located in the middle of a coil, the current (implied magnitude) in and out of a coil will be equal.", I was implying current magnitude only. I didn't imply or say anything about phase unless I used the word, "phase" in the sentence. I also have not said anything about the phase of the currents into and out of your toroidal inductance except to say it replaces approximately 18 degrees of antenna. The current at the base of a short vertical antenna is at its maximum there. So now if you're saying that it *won't* exhibit a phase shift if placed at the base of a short antenna, let's try this. As you can see above, I never said anything like that. Suppose I remount my antenna to eliminate the shunting effect of the mounting, and do my measurements at 3.8 MHz as before. Suppose the base input Z is, say, 35 -j380. You choose any inductor value you'd like, that will best illustrate your method, and tell me what output to input current ratio to expect. I am still leery about your ability to separate small phase shifts from noise. We need to make the inductor large enough to ensure the phase shift measurements are above the noise level. I have no disagreement that a "bugcatcher" coil, or any coil of physically significant size, will exhibit a phase shift and magnitude change of current from one end to the other. Huh?????? I thought that was what the argument was all about. What triggered this whole discussion was W8JI's alleged assertion that a loading coil like a bugcatcher doesn't affect the current at all. Where we disagree is that you believe that a physically very small inductor will also exhibit this. I don't. The effect of a very small inductor may be too small to measure in the presence of strong fields and noise. Ask yourself, at exactly what value of inductor does the phase shift completely disappear? +j1? +j10? +j100? +j1000? What is the crossover point from some phase shift to zero phase shift? Can you measure a phase shift of 0.1 degree at HF? Zero phase implies faster than light propagation through the coil. -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |