Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 12th 03, 03:15 AM
Yuri Blanarovich
 
Posts: n/a
Default


A design which 'exceeds' specified performance is as poor as one which
'under exceeds'.

Significant deviations in either direction are sure indications of poor
engineering education and incompetence.

Both deviations are equally expensive and wasteful in terms of time,
materials and labour.



Now that is some "wisdom" coming out of FGQ think tank :-)
All the briliant engineers and inventors? Shame on you!
You come up with better and cheaper solution, you are incompetent!
(must be union mentality)

BUm
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Smith Chart Quiz Radio913 Antenna 315 October 21st 03 05:31 AM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
Eznec modeling loading coils? Roy Lewallen Antenna 11 August 18th 03 02:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017