Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote in message ...
Mark Keith wrote: My argument boils down to: What does this mean to the antenna builder or modeler? To the antenna user, or the antenna builder/modeler who doesn't care about current distribution, it would probably mean nothing. Well, I care a great deal myself, I can't see how this would help me at all. What would you do about it? If any discrepancy is so small to be barely measurable, all this speculation about gross error when modeling is *to me* a load of hooey. The discrepancy varies anywhere from barely measureable to very measureable. That says a lot... Where is the beef that this claimed variation of current across a coil causes drastic modeling or coil placement calculation errors? Sorry, I just don't see it. What am I missing here? I think it should only matter to people who want to give advice on the subject. That doesn't answer the question. MK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |