Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
But I can assure you that most all the theory has been pretty much etched in stone for quite a few years. No one is going to come up with some new gadjit that is going to break all the rules. Just ain't gonna happen. Assume a future antenna emitting entangled photons and explain to us how present antenna theory handles non-locality. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
1/4 vs 1/2 wavelength antenna | Antenna | |||
Transmission Lines & Electrical Code | Antenna | |||
Quarter wavelength sloper for 80 mtrs | Antenna | |||
For the electrical engineers | Homebrew | |||
For the electrical engineers | Homebrew |