Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
wrote: But I can assure you that most all the theory has been pretty much etched in stone for quite a few years. No one is going to come up with some new gadjit that is going to break all the rules. Just ain't gonna happen. Assume a future antenna emitting entangled photons and explain to us how present antenna theory handles non-locality. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- Go ahead, Cecil, prove the world wrong. Be the first on your block to design a real-world antenna based on particle physics, but remember the correspondance principle. 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
1/4 vs 1/2 wavelength antenna | Antenna | |||
Transmission Lines & Electrical Code | Antenna | |||
Quarter wavelength sloper for 80 mtrs | Antenna | |||
For the electrical engineers | Homebrew | |||
For the electrical engineers | Homebrew |