Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #51   Report Post  
Old March 28th 05, 02:09 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Asimov wrote:
We are in 2005 now and some geek in a broom closet is just about
to unleash a comparable cataclysmic change to our world and one

better
count on it!


I doubt it will have anything to do with antennas though..
And I doubt it will be a geek in a broom closet.
MK

  #52   Report Post  
Old March 28th 05, 03:02 AM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Albert Einstein was merely the first to realise what is obvious to
anybody who thinks about it.

What's all the fuss about for the last 100 years?


  #54   Report Post  
Old March 28th 05, 07:29 AM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 02:02:55 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote:

Albert Einstein was merely the first to realise what is obvious to
anybody who thinks about it.

What's all the fuss about for the last 100 years?


Hi Reg,

No one else wrote it down. Sure you can "think about it," but if you
keep dialing the same number to talk to Mum and you get chinese
take-out, then "thinking about it" is not all that it is cracked up to
be.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #55   Report Post  
Old March 28th 05, 04:32 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Reg Edwards wrote:
Albert Einstein was merely the first to realise what is obvious to
anybody who thinks about it.


Some things that Albert Einstein said sound a lot like Art.

"Imagination is more important than knowledge."

"Education is what remains after one has forgotten everything he
learned in school."

"All our science, measured against reality, is primitive and
childlike ..."

"As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not
certain, as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality."

"Whoever undertakes to set himself up as a judge of Truth and
Knowledge is shipwrecked by the laughter of the gods."

"Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities."

"He who joyfully marches to music rank and file, has already earned my
contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the
spinal cord would surely suffice."
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----


  #56   Report Post  
Old March 29th 05, 07:44 PM
Jim Kelley
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Cecil Moore wrote:

Anyone want to
predict the effect of non-locality on Maxwell's equations?


How better to explain interference phenomena at, "Alpha Centauri" for
example? :-)

ac6xg

  #57   Report Post  
Old March 30th 05, 12:38 AM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim Kelley wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:
Anyone want to
predict the effect of non-locality on Maxwell's equations?


How better to explain interference phenomena at, "Alpha Centauri" for
example? :-)


How better indeed? As I remember, it was Dr. Best's assertion
that the source always provided the extra energy during construc-
tive interference (no matter how far away the source might be).
I, OTOH, tend to believe "Optics", by Hecht where he asserts
that there must always be an energy balance between constructive
interference and destructive interference (as demonstrated by
the radiation pattern of an antenna).
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #58   Report Post  
Old March 30th 05, 12:49 AM
Jim Kelley
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Cecil Moore wrote:

Jim Kelley wrote:


Cecil Moore wrote:

Anyone want to
predict the effect of non-locality on Maxwell's equations?



How better to explain interference phenomena at, "Alpha Centauri" for
example? :-)



How better indeed? As I remember, it was Dr. Best's assertion
that the source always provided the extra energy during construc-
tive interference (no matter how far away the source might be).
I, OTOH, tend to believe "Optics", by Hecht where he asserts
that there must always be an energy balance between constructive
interference and destructive interference (as demonstrated by
the radiation pattern of an antenna).


It's certainly correct in almost any instance to say that the source of
energy provides the energy. Not necessarily so of other points in
space. And only rarely do we find any "extra" energy in physical
systems. ;-)

ac6xg

  #59   Report Post  
Old March 31st 05, 10:33 PM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Free Energy" is indeed hard to find...
However, consider an antenna made of a superconducting material--it would at
least be impossible to lose any (at least due to resistance and heating!)

Regards

--
Hay, if'n ya'll cun't konstructivly partecipete in this har disscusion, haw
aboot speel-checkin it fer me?


"Jim Kelley" wrote in message
...


Cecil Moore wrote:

Jim Kelley wrote:


Cecil Moore wrote:

Anyone want to
predict the effect of non-locality on Maxwell's equations?


How better to explain interference phenomena at, "Alpha Centauri" for
example? :-)



How better indeed? As I remember, it was Dr. Best's assertion
that the source always provided the extra energy during construc-
tive interference (no matter how far away the source might be).
I, OTOH, tend to believe "Optics", by Hecht where he asserts
that there must always be an energy balance between constructive
interference and destructive interference (as demonstrated by
the radiation pattern of an antenna).


It's certainly correct in almost any instance to say that the source of
energy provides the energy. Not necessarily so of other points in space.
And only rarely do we find any "extra" energy in physical systems. ;-)

ac6xg



  #60   Report Post  
Old March 31st 05, 10:53 PM
Jim Kelley
 
Posts: n/a
Default



John Smith wrote:

"Free Energy" is indeed hard to find...
However, consider an antenna made of a superconducting material--it would at
least be impossible to lose any (at least due to resistance and heating!)

Regards


Yea, but it's a real pain having to haul the liquid helium dewar up the
tower in the middle of a dx opening.

ac6xg

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1/4 vs 1/2 wavelength antenna Nug Antenna 209 March 5th 05 09:09 PM
Transmission Lines & Electrical Code gibberdill Antenna 7 November 7th 04 03:58 PM
Quarter wavelength sloper for 80 mtrs Jack Painter Antenna 1 February 14th 04 03:40 AM
For the electrical engineers Tdonaly Homebrew 2 September 26th 03 01:28 AM
For the electrical engineers Tdonaly Homebrew 0 September 26th 03 12:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017