Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore, W5DXP wrote:
"I vaguely remember something about efficiency versus power handling capability being the difference in the 75 ohm standard and the 50 ohm standard." That seens exactly right. It`s the reason you would use 75-ohm Zo cable for TV distribution at low-power where you want to minimize loss but there is no danger of too much voltage flashing over the cable. Terman in his 1955 edition on page 106 says: "---in an air-insulated coaxial line of given outer radius b, Q will be maximum when the inner conductor has a size such thet b/a = 3.6. (b=inner radius of outer conductor in concentric line, and a=outer radius of inner conductor in concentric line) corresponding to Zo = 77 ohms. These are also the proportions for minimum power loss----." However the maximum power that can be transmitted without exceeding a given voltage gradient occurs when b/a 1.65, giving Zo = 30 ohms." So for minimum loss you would want Zo of about 75 ohms and for maximum power capability you would want 30 ohms. I suspect Zo=50 ohms is a compromise between power handling capability and reasonable loss. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] | Info | |||
Ladder line question ???? | Antenna | |||
Folded monopole dilemma | Antenna | |||
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] | Info | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy - new measurement | Antenna |