Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg Edwards wrote:
"John - KD5YI" wrote Cecil Moore wrote: Reg Edwards wrote: Many years back a similar sort of calculation was done for coax. Coax does not suffer from proximity effect. It's easier to work out. The answer was 75 ohms. That's how 75 ohms became the standard comunications Ro. I vaguely remember something about efficiency Vs power handling capability being the difference in the 75 ohm standard and the 50 ohm standard. Is that right? -- ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- Page 5-15 of The ARRL UHF/Microwave Experimenter's Manual says: "Consider that both power handling capability and cable losses vary with Zo. It has been shown that cable losses are minimum at a characteristic impedance on the order of 75 [Ohms], while power handling capability is maximum at a Zo of about 30 [Ohms]." (The book used the Greek symbol rather than [Ohms]) The quoted passage is in a chapter by Dr. Paul Shuch, N6TX, Professor of Electronics, Pennsylvania College of Technology. At the end of the quote, is an indication to see footnote 13 which is: "Moreno, Theodore, Microwave Transmission Design Data, Dover Publications, 1948." 73, John ============================================ It is unreliable to use ARRL and similar publications as Bibles. They are written by amateurs for amateurs and tell only a sufficient fraction of the whole story. Phrases such as "It has been shown that .... " arise. They also refer to UHF/Microwave when LF and HF are of interest. At microwave frequencies the dielectric loss cannot be considered negligible. For minimum attenuation, air-spaced coax Zo = 75 ohms and D/d = 3.6 For solid polyethylene Zo is smaller. Confusion about the value of Zo which maximises power handling capabilty arises because coax cables have different shapes and materials to support the inner conductor. Even though the dielectric may be considered lossless its presence affects matched line loss. If my memory serves me correct, for maximum power handling I think 50 ohms refers to air-spaced coax and 30 ohms or thereabouts refers to solid polyethylene dielectric. Or it may be the other way about. It will be different again for a different dielectric permittivity. For a coax line used as a tuned circuit, eg., when short-circuited, maximum impedance at resonance occurs when Zo = 132 ohms and D/d ratio = 9.1 And just to add a little more to the confusion, whether the outer conductor is solid or braided also makes a small difference. ---- Reg, G4FGQ Okay, Reg, then go read the material referenced by footnote 13. That's one reason I included it. Maybe that way we won't need to rely on your memory. John |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] | Info | |||
Ladder line question ???? | Antenna | |||
Folded monopole dilemma | Antenna | |||
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] | Info | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy - new measurement | Antenna |