Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Buck wrote: I have aluminum poles of three diameters, 1.5, 1, and .5 inches. I have enough of the first two to create a pole of about 15 feet each and about 8 to 9 feet with the 1/5 inch poles. The poles are no more than 4 feet long each, but they are able to tuck inside each other, at least for the same diameter. What I want to do is to make up a 'kit' with these that I can take to the field to setup whatever antenna I want to use at the time. For example, I might set it up as a 20 meter vertical in one configuration, but in the evening, I might reconfigure it to 75 meters or 15, or 30 or whatever I desire. One consideration is to create a high-q coil for it. I am thinking of using 1/4 inch copper tubing to make a ten to twelve inch diameter coil so I can match it to the lower bands. That thickness of coil is overkill.... I have been reading that base loaded coils have to be matched to the antenna, but center loaded verticals are more closely matched to 50 ohms. The loading coil is used to tune out the capacitive reactance. The input impedance will vary to length of the vertical, coil loss, ground loss, etc..Just because a center load is used, doesn't always mean the input impedance will end up 50 ohms.. from what I have been reading, the center loaded coil requires more turns and a top loaded coil even more. Yes. A capacity hat is also a viable option. It's the best option. And top loading is best using capacitive loading, where as if using a coil for top loading, the coil losses overshadow any increase in efficiency from the improved current distribution, etc.. Top loading using wires is the best system you could use, if you can swing it. I am wondering how much I am helping or hurting myself with the larger coil or if I would be better off with a smaller coil. It's not that critical... One thought is to connect x number of poles, then the coil, then another set of poles or a whip to make the final adjustment for the match or to match the antenna by tapping the coil. I am open to all suggestions, but I am interested in knowing the best location for the coil and the best size for it. The *best* location for a loading coil is appx 2/3 to 3/4 up the radiator. But even half way up is fine. Base loading is the least efficient, and has the worst current distribution. But it uses the least number of coil turns, and would have the least coil loss. Being low, it's the easiest to adjust also... Don't forget that the ground system for a short loaded vertical, becomes even more critical than for a full 1/4 wave vertical. It's for this reason that I usually avoid verticals for portable use, unless the ground issue can be dealt with. IE: at the beach is a good place for verticals...But in the boonies, on lossy, rocky, ground, they may not do so hot if you have no radials. In that case, I would take the vertical "sticks", and hang a dipole from them...:/ My mobile antenna is my usual "portable vertical"...MK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antron + loading coil | CB | |||
Current in loading coil, EZNEC - helix | Antenna | |||
Antenna Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
Radial loading coil | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |