Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Thank you to Cecil, Reg, Mark, Asimov and Richard. I have read what you said and done more reading about Cap Hats. The Cap Hat doesn't improve the inductor, it basically replaces it, at least in part, which removes the loss of the inductor. I misunderstood that somehow. What I will focus on, then, is to create some form of capacity hat for each appropriate band together with an adjustable vertical length for tuning to the appropriate frequency. Mark, You may have a point about the dipole being better, especially for portable operation. I just want to experiment with the aluminum poles I have. I may take your advice and use them to create a portable tower in the long-run. But first I think I will try out the vertical. Thanks to all, Buck N4PGW On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:56:34 -0500, Buck wrote: I have aluminum poles of three diameters, 1.5, 1, and .5 inches. I have enough of the first two to create a pole of about 15 feet each and about 8 to 9 feet with the 1/5 inch poles. The poles are no more than 4 feet long each, but they are able to tuck inside each other, at least for the same diameter. What I want to do is to make up a 'kit' with these that I can take to the field to setup whatever antenna I want to use at the time. For example, I might set it up as a 20 meter vertical in one configuration, but in the evening, I might reconfigure it to 75 meters or 15, or 30 or whatever I desire. One consideration is to create a high-q coil for it. I am thinking of using 1/4 inch copper tubing to make a ten to twelve inch diameter coil so I can match it to the lower bands. I have been reading that base loaded coils have to be matched to the antenna, but center loaded verticals are more closely matched to 50 ohms. from what I have been reading, the center loaded coil requires more turns and a top loaded coil even more. A capacity hat is also a viable option. I am wondering how much I am helping or hurting myself with the larger coil or if I would be better off with a smaller coil. One thought is to connect x number of poles, then the coil, then another set of poles or a whip to make the final adjustment for the match or to match the antenna by tapping the coil. I am open to all suggestions, but I am interested in knowing the best location for the coil and the best size for it. Thank you -- 73 for now Buck N4PGW |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antron + loading coil | CB | |||
Current in loading coil, EZNEC - helix | Antenna | |||
Antenna Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
Radial loading coil | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |