Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:45:12 GMT, "Jerry Martes" wrote: Your thoughts on sweep frequency for impedance measurement is very interesting. If I could figure out a way to build the "sensors" I'd probably build a sweep system for 2 meters. The ARRL handbooks of yore have several designs. Google "monimatch". Although I could handle building a sweep frequency generator, I wouldnt know how to convert the "incident and reflected" to an impedance. Software would do that. No it wouldn't, unless you could figure out some way to get vector magnitude and phase from the two channels. I suspect that, if sweep frequency impedance measurements was simple enough for Me to do, someone would already have done it and published in one of the HAM magazines. Perhaps not the ham magazines; I know I've written at least three articles in Kitplanes magazine as to how to do it for aircraft antenna VSWR. Jim |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:42:14 -0800, "RST Engineering"
wrote: Although I could handle building a sweep frequency generator, I wouldnt know how to convert the "incident and reflected" to an impedance. Software would do that. No it wouldn't, unless you could figure out some way to get vector magnitude and phase from the two channels. Hi All, I have since researched the archives to find my reference: http://users.adelphia.net/~n2pk/ What can be done, what has been done, and what might be inferred is revealed at this page. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Richard I'm way behind on the learning curve. I had read about that Vector Network Analyzer last year. it looked too complicated for me to build. And, in my ignorance, I thought that system was what the MFJ used. The Smith Chart plots from his VNA data really impresses me. I could possible get interested in building something like that for VHF, if I understood it. Jerry "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:42:14 -0800, "RST Engineering" wrote: Although I could handle building a sweep frequency generator, I wouldnt know how to convert the "incident and reflected" to an impedance. Software would do that. No it wouldn't, unless you could figure out some way to get vector magnitude and phase from the two channels. Hi All, I have since researched the archives to find my reference: http://users.adelphia.net/~n2pk/ What can be done, what has been done, and what might be inferred is revealed at this page. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:44:45 GMT, "Jerry Martes"
wrote: The Smith Chart plots from his VNA data really impresses me. I could possible get interested in building something like that for VHF, if I understood it. Hi Jerry, Take the plunge, that is the best way to learn. You already exhibit positive motivation and that's the hard part of learning. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:19:40 -0800, Richard Clark
wrote: [snip] Hi All, I have since researched the archives to find my reference: http://users.adelphia.net/~n2pk/ What can be done, what has been done, and what might be inferred is revealed at this page. This is the greatest thing since sliced bread. I've built one for ~$250.00. Here's a photo taken during construction and checkout: http://www.qsl.net/n7ws/ANA_1.jpg (350K) Currently it's limited to 60 MHz although variants are in the works to increase this. Another minor limitation is that the software is DOS-based although Windows software is under development by other users. Xp users, like me, have a couple of hoops to jump through to access the parallel port but it's no big deal. The accuracy, however, is lab quality and is comparable to commercial network analyzers costing tens to hundreds of $K like I used to use, although it's achieved at the expense of measurement speed. Also see: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/N2PK-VNA/ A higher cost alternative with much reduced dynamic range is he http://radio.tentec.com/Amateur/vna |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:15:41 -0700, Wes Stewart
wrote: This is the greatest thing since sliced bread. Hi Wes, I can think of no greater commendation from an authority. Thanx for the insights offered. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: Palomar RX Noise Bridge | Swap | |||
Icom 746pro Testimonial | Shortwave | |||
FS: Palomar Engineers R-X Noise Bridge | Swap | |||
FS Tennatest RF Noise Bridge 1-150 MHz | Swap | |||
Automatic RF noise cancellation and audio noise measurement | Homebrew |