Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 30th 05, 05:42 PM
RST Engineering
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:45:12 GMT, "Jerry Martes"
wrote:

Your thoughts on sweep frequency for impedance measurement is very
interesting. If I could figure out a way to build the "sensors" I'd
probably build a sweep system for 2 meters.


The ARRL handbooks of yore have several designs. Google "monimatch".


Although I could handle
building a sweep frequency generator, I wouldnt know how to convert the
"incident and reflected" to an impedance.


Software would do that.


No it wouldn't, unless you could figure out some way to get vector magnitude
and phase from the two channels.


I suspect that, if sweep frequency impedance measurements was simple
enough for Me to do, someone would already have done it and published in
one
of the HAM magazines.


Perhaps not the ham magazines; I know I've written at least three articles
in Kitplanes magazine as to how to do it for aircraft antenna VSWR.

Jim


  #2   Report Post  
Old March 30th 05, 06:19 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:42:14 -0800, "RST Engineering"
wrote:

Although I could handle
building a sweep frequency generator, I wouldnt know how to convert the
"incident and reflected" to an impedance.


Software would do that.


No it wouldn't, unless you could figure out some way to get vector magnitude
and phase from the two channels.


Hi All,

I have since researched the archives to find my reference:
http://users.adelphia.net/~n2pk/

What can be done, what has been done, and what might be inferred is
revealed at this page.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #3   Report Post  
Old March 30th 05, 06:44 PM
Jerry Martes
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Richard

I'm way behind on the learning curve. I had read about that Vector
Network Analyzer last year. it looked too complicated for me to build.
And, in my ignorance, I thought that system was what the MFJ used.

The Smith Chart plots from his VNA data really impresses me. I could
possible get interested in building something like that for VHF, if I
understood it.

Jerry



"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:42:14 -0800, "RST Engineering"
wrote:

Although I could handle
building a sweep frequency generator, I wouldnt know how to convert the
"incident and reflected" to an impedance.

Software would do that.


No it wouldn't, unless you could figure out some way to get vector
magnitude
and phase from the two channels.


Hi All,

I have since researched the archives to find my reference:
http://users.adelphia.net/~n2pk/

What can be done, what has been done, and what might be inferred is
revealed at this page.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC



  #4   Report Post  
Old March 30th 05, 06:51 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:44:45 GMT, "Jerry Martes"
wrote:

The Smith Chart plots from his VNA data really impresses me. I could
possible get interested in building something like that for VHF, if I
understood it.


Hi Jerry,

Take the plunge, that is the best way to learn. You already exhibit
positive motivation and that's the hard part of learning.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #5   Report Post  
Old March 30th 05, 07:15 PM
Wes Stewart
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:19:40 -0800, Richard Clark
wrote:

[snip]

Hi All,

I have since researched the archives to find my reference:
http://users.adelphia.net/~n2pk/

What can be done, what has been done, and what might be inferred is
revealed at this page.


This is the greatest thing since sliced bread.

I've built one for ~$250.00. Here's a photo taken during construction
and checkout:

http://www.qsl.net/n7ws/ANA_1.jpg (350K)

Currently it's limited to 60 MHz although variants are in the works to
increase this. Another minor limitation is that the software is
DOS-based although Windows software is under development by other
users. Xp users, like me, have a couple of hoops to jump through to
access the parallel port but it's no big deal.

The accuracy, however, is lab quality and is comparable to commercial
network analyzers costing tens to hundreds of $K like I used to use,
although it's achieved at the expense of measurement speed.

Also see:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/N2PK-VNA/

A higher cost alternative with much reduced dynamic range is he

http://radio.tentec.com/Amateur/vna





  #6   Report Post  
Old March 30th 05, 07:42 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:15:41 -0700, Wes Stewart
wrote:

This is the greatest thing since sliced bread.


Hi Wes,

I can think of no greater commendation from an authority. Thanx for
the insights offered.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FA: Palomar RX Noise Bridge W8KZW Swap 0 January 9th 05 06:29 PM
Icom 746pro Testimonial Pilotbutteradio Shortwave 1 September 29th 04 12:47 PM
FS: Palomar Engineers R-X Noise Bridge Darrell Earnshaw Swap 0 August 9th 04 10:04 PM
FS Tennatest RF Noise Bridge 1-150 MHz Marvin Moss Swap 1 August 15th 03 03:36 PM
Automatic RF noise cancellation and audio noise measurement Dave Shrader Homebrew 35 August 11th 03 01:07 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017