RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Antenna (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/)
-   -   halogen rf? (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/68208-halogen-rf.html)

garigue April 4th 05 02:42 AM



You can either accept the responsibility to control EMI in your hobby, or

go
back to 11 meters and cable TV.


Ed
WB6WSN



Ya know Ed I have never met you so I can't say for sure if you are a
pontificating idiot or not. I have never been on CB and the cable TV is
mostly the History Channel and such. A "teaching post" , albeit boring,
would be acceptable but the above zinger is not funny nor complimentary of
the guys on this thread. My installing of the halogens were from the point
of my back 9 of life eyesight when connecting things in back of the
equipment not to be on when I was working quasi land with 5 watts. The
condescending attitude displayed in your pontification is like many hams I
have run across in the last 40 years of this endeavor and causes our service
to loose valuable young people. Unfortunately I am not young but on the
other hand I have been around enough to recognize those who would lord over
others from a "technical" standpoint. Yep there Ed I have used bypass caps,
torroids, made brute force filters etc. to make my operating a bit more
enjoyable ...now if they only had a filter for your type of letter and
attitude we all would be ahead.

73 Tom Popovic KI3R



Ed Price April 4th 05 03:38 AM


"garigue" wrote in message
...


You can either accept the responsibility to control EMI in your hobby, or

go
back to 11 meters and cable TV.


Ed
WB6WSN



Ya know Ed I have never met you so I can't say for sure if you are a
pontificating idiot or not. I have never been on CB and the cable TV is
mostly the History Channel and such. A "teaching post" , albeit boring,
would be acceptable but the above zinger is not funny nor complimentary of
the guys on this thread. My installing of the halogens were from the
point
of my back 9 of life eyesight when connecting things in back of the
equipment not to be on when I was working quasi land with 5 watts. The
condescending attitude displayed in your pontification is like many hams I
have run across in the last 40 years of this endeavor and causes our
service
to loose valuable young people. Unfortunately I am not young but on the
other hand I have been around enough to recognize those who would lord
over
others from a "technical" standpoint. Yep there Ed I have used bypass
caps,
torroids, made brute force filters etc. to make my operating a bit more
enjoyable ...now if they only had a filter for your type of letter and
attitude we all would be ahead.

73 Tom Popovic KI3R




Tom:

You can tell if I'm "pontificating" by reading my text and determining the
validity of my advice. OTOH, I am getting weary of people who choose a hobby
that involves RF propagation, and then get all whiney when they add an
obviously noisy RF source to their environment. If you want to be a ham,
then I'm going to hold you to a higher standard. And what should be an
example of not meeting that standard?

As for "losing valuable young people"; well, if some guy tells me his
arc-welding hobby interferes with his DX contesting, well, that's just too
pathetic for futher comment.

As a self-declared "old guy", I would expect you to understand the concept
of minimum standrds of performance. Remember when FCC exams really meant
something? You sound all "new-age touchy-feely", finding personal insult in
a general comment about performance standards. Now I'm truly sorry that you
interpreted my post that way, and it's too bad you couldn't say something
about the technical content. I will apologize to any technically apt CB'ers
and TV viewers who also may share your sadness, but reasons of visual
ability, dexterity and age don't excuse lack of basic RF understanding.

BTW, there IS a filter for my type of post. (True, the best filter would be
your ability to understand a post.) You can simply ignore my postings, as I
always post from the same account and I clearly identify myself. You could
also set up an automated filter process, but then that would require
technical competence in software operation, and that brings up a whole new
area in which you may find offense. Best we not go there.


--
Ed
WB6WSN
El Cajon, CA USA



Jerry Martes April 4th 05 06:27 AM





"garigue" wrote in message
...


You can either accept the responsibility to control EMI in your hobby, or

go
back to 11 meters and cable TV.


Ed
WB6WSN



Ya know Ed I have never met you so I can't say for sure if you are a
pontificating idiot or not. I have never been on CB and the cable TV is
mostly the History Channel and such. A "teaching post" , albeit boring,
would be acceptable but the above zinger is not funny nor complimentary of
the guys on this thread. My installing of the halogens were from the
point
of my back 9 of life eyesight when connecting things in back of the
equipment not to be on when I was working quasi land with 5 watts. The
condescending attitude displayed in your pontification is like many hams I
have run across in the last 40 years of this endeavor and causes our
service
to loose valuable young people. Unfortunately I am not young but on the
other hand I have been around enough to recognize those who would lord
over
others from a "technical" standpoint. Yep there Ed I have used bypass
caps,
torroids, made brute force filters etc. to make my operating a bit more
enjoyable ...now if they only had a filter for your type of letter and
attitude we all would be ahead.

73 Tom Popovic KI3R



Tom

Although I can see your point about Ed's sharp tongue, he is likely a
techincally bright guy who is as intolerant of old guys like you and me who
make more mistakes than we'd like.
I'm 74 and used to be a fairly active antenna making ham in the 1960s.
But, I dont know crap compared to the guys who currently study about
antennas and electronics. I'd bet that you and I will have more comfort if
we dont get overly excited when we get yelled at for writing things that
dont quite fit with the current level of 'technical knowledge'.
There is so much really good technical guidance available within this news
group that it doesnt make any sense for us old guys to get upset when we get
insulted. I've found it alot easir to read around most criticism. That way
I can continue to enjoy this nifty way of keeping aware of antenna
development (without having to go back to books and class rooms).
You are welcome to tell me to F888 off if this post offends. I only offer
it as a way of showing that even though I see your point, I also consider it
so unimportant that you and I get yelled at occasionally.

Jerry



Ed Price April 4th 05 08:38 AM


"Jerry Martes" wrote in message
news:Xe44e.23340$k66.15439@trnddc03...
"garigue" wrote in message
...


You can either accept the responsibility to control EMI in your hobby,
or

go
back to 11 meters and cable TV.


Ed
WB6WSN



Ya know Ed I have never met you so I can't say for sure if you are a
pontificating idiot or not. 73 Tom Popovic KI3R



Tom

Although I can see your point about Ed's sharp tongue, he is likely a
techincally bright guy who is as intolerant of old guys like you and me
who make more mistakes than we'd like.
Jerry



Things are getting too fuzzy here, so I'll try to sharpen the focus a bit.

First, you self-declared "old guys" have only about a decade and a half
seniority on me. I have always tried to respect ability, regardless of the
age of its holder. OTOH, old jerks are still jerks.

Second, I have met myself, and I can assure you that I can be considered an
idiot (having already progressed through the grades of imbecile and moron) .
But I try mightily to never pontificate.

Third. silver-tongued, omniscient orators sometimes close with a zinger
that's a bit too barbed, so I again apologize if my karma ran over your
dogma.

--
Ed
WB6WSN
El Cajon, CA USA



Floyd Sense April 4th 05 06:26 PM


Gee Ed, I don't even have a dog in this hunt, and read this newsgroup only
in hopes of learning something every now and then. But, your responses ARE
offensive and your comments generally negate any wisdom you bring to the
subject. I'll tell you how I try to keep things civil in one of these
conversations. In every case, I try to respond and conduct myself as if the
other fellows were standing in front of me eye to eye. Most of us would try
to be diplomatic, even to a complete stranger, in that situation. In some
parts of the country, or in another time, doing otherwise would earn you a
punch.

Anyway, I DO know how to filter out your posts and you've certainly earned
your position on that list.

73, Floyd - K8AC




Bob Miller April 4th 05 08:47 PM

On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:57:59 -0700, "Ed Price" wrote:



You can either accept the responsibility to control EMI in your hobby, or go
back to 11 meters and cable TV.


Ed
WB6WSN


Well, I've got a buzz at my qth, and unplugging the warts, outdoor
lights, florescents and damn near everything else in the house hasn't
solved my buzzzzz -- oh well, onward in understanding rf energy and
the vagaries of its creation... maybe I need to buy a bb gun and start
shooting out the streetlights... :-)

bob
k5qwg




Ed Price April 5th 05 09:28 AM


"Bob Miller" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:57:59 -0700, "Ed Price" wrote:



You can either accept the responsibility to control EMI in your hobby, or
go
back to 11 meters and cable TV.


Ed
WB6WSN


Well, I've got a buzz at my qth, and unplugging the warts, outdoor
lights, florescents and damn near everything else in the house hasn't
solved my buzzzzz -- oh well, onward in understanding rf energy and
the vagaries of its creation... maybe I need to buy a bb gun and start
shooting out the streetlights... :-)

bob
k5qwg




Bob:

You are on the right track; a process of elimination is often the fastest
way to identify the noise source. But don't underestimate the wonders of
seemingly prosaic household systems. Microprocessor controllers are
everywhere, from your washing machine to your sprinkler controllers to your
furnace controls. And that's just YOUR house, your neighbors all have their
own sources to add to the general noise level.

Try a battery-powered AM radio, tuned between stations. See if you can
locate the noise with the built-in directional loopstick antenna. Even if
the noise is being radiated from a number of powerlines, you can still try
cutting power for your entire house. OTOH, some gadgets will have battery
backup, so, like my sprinkler controls, the microprocessor keeps right on
running even when I cut off the power.

Neighbors are notoriously uncooperative when you suggest cutting off the
power to their house while you search for RF noise.


--
Ed
WB6WSN
El Cajon, CA USA



Ed Price April 5th 05 10:35 AM


"Floyd Sense" wrote in message
...

Gee Ed, I don't even have a dog in this hunt, and read this newsgroup only
in hopes of learning something every now and then. But, your responses
ARE offensive and your comments generally negate any wisdom you bring to
the subject. I'll tell you how I try to keep things civil in one of these
conversations. In every case, I try to respond and conduct myself as if
the other fellows were standing in front of me eye to eye. Most of us
would try to be diplomatic, even to a complete stranger, in that
situation. In some parts of the country, or in another time, doing
otherwise would earn you a punch.

Anyway, I DO know how to filter out your posts and you've certainly earned
your position on that list.

73, Floyd - K8AC




I am surprised that you would favor the person-to-person model, since you
appear to be willing to ignore my two attempts at conciliation and appear to
enjoy remaining in a self-aggreived condition. As you point out, certain
attitudes in certain places can earn you the flat-face award, and you seem
to be a determined candidate.

One of the hallmarks of wisdom is knowing when you are being insulted and
when you are being presented with an uncomfortable reminder of your
condition. As an Extra, do you really think that a ham should be surprised
to find that an arc-discharge luminary, placed in proximity to his rig,
causes RFI? I hold a ham to a slightly higher standard of understanding of
RFI than I would expect of the general populace. RF noise is a very basic
part of the RF communication hobby known as ham radio, so just how low
should the bar be set for understanding of the basics of your hobby? If the
basics are too challenging for you, then perhaps you should either get
smarter or live within a less demanding cohort. And just what electronics
hobbies could those be? CB radio certainly comes to mind; a venue of zero
examinations and largely technically incompetent appliance operators. And
below that, cable TV, where the two big challenges are finding the power
button and a channel.

Your functional competence in communicating within Usenet is also deficient,
as you sent a redundant copy of your post to my personal address. Please try
to learn the difference between replying to a post in a newsgroup and
replying to the poster's address (especially when the poster affords you the
courtesy of a non-spoofed address). I find it amusing that you deem I should
get TWO copies of YOUR post, while you publicly declare that my posts are
unfit for your attention. Further, your declared existence in this group,
that you "read this newsgroup only in hopes of learning something every now
and then", is selfish and parasitic. Usenet is a participatory forum, and
you should try to find satisfaction in contributing as well as in taking.

Finally, I don't know if you intended pithy sarcasm, or simply displayed
further evidence of senility, by signing your missive with a "73". After
insulting my intentions, you close with the generally accepted icon for
"best wishes" or "cheers". Thank you for the complete reversal of your
entire thought process in the space of one line! I must assume that the
closing salutation must have been appended AFTER you took your daily meds.


--
Ed
WB6WSN
El Cajon, CA USA



garigue April 5th 05 04:25 PM



You can either accept the responsibility to control EMI in your hobby, or

go
back to 11 meters and cable TV.


Ed
WB6WSN


Well, I've got a buzz at my qth, and unplugging the warts, outdoor
lights, florescents and damn near everything else in the house hasn't
solved my buzzzzz -- oh well, onward in understanding rf energy and
the vagaries of its creation... maybe I need to buy a bb gun and start
shooting out the streetlights... :-)

bob
k5qwg


Hi Bob ...... wherein lies the "nut" in this whole conumdrum. These RF
generating devises should not even be on shore. I think that Great Britian
still has, or in the past, a very strict set of rules regarding devises.
Proper engineering, with I venture to say minimal cost, would clean up
things significantly. Even if every ham had an EE and thoroughly understood
every detail of this problem ..... what would we do with Mrs. Jones next
door or better yet in the next apartment. As Ed had mentioned some are not
too responsive to having us bypass the speakers on their new 5K$ electric
organ.

73 KI3R Tom Popovic Belle Vernon Pa.




garigue April 5th 05 04:56 PM


Tom

Although I can see your point about Ed's sharp tongue, he is likely a
techincally bright guy who is as intolerant of old guys like you and me

who
make more mistakes than we'd like.
I'm 74 and used to be a fairly active antenna making ham in the 1960s.
But, I dont know crap compared to the guys who currently study about
antennas and electronics. I'd bet that you and I will have more comfort

if
we dont get overly excited when we get yelled at for writing things that
dont quite fit with the current level of 'technical knowledge'.
There is so much really good technical guidance available within this

news
group that it doesnt make any sense for us old guys to get upset when we

get
insulted. I've found it alot easir to read around most criticism. That

way
I can continue to enjoy this nifty way of keeping aware of antenna
development (without having to go back to books and class rooms).
You are welcome to tell me to F888 off if this post offends. I only

offer
it as a way of showing that even though I see your point, I also consider

it
so unimportant that you and I get yelled at occasionally.

Jerry


Hi Jerry ....there would be absolutely no reason to tell you do anything
concerning the above post. I look upon the newgroups in a positive way to
share information. I have drawn ire from some in the past but maybe those
individuals will think the next time they hit the send key. There are
plenty of people who follow these groups who don't send messages and I feel
a good part of them are young people who are interested. I remember those
times as a teenager just starting out and being treated quite poorly by some
OTers. We really need to remember what we were like starting out and the
errors we made. As for getting yelled at ......you must be married .....
as my dad once told me ...the best 2 words are yes dear .... and boy he was
right.

73 Jerry ....... Tom KI3R





All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com