![]() |
You can either accept the responsibility to control EMI in your hobby, or go back to 11 meters and cable TV. Ed WB6WSN Ya know Ed I have never met you so I can't say for sure if you are a pontificating idiot or not. I have never been on CB and the cable TV is mostly the History Channel and such. A "teaching post" , albeit boring, would be acceptable but the above zinger is not funny nor complimentary of the guys on this thread. My installing of the halogens were from the point of my back 9 of life eyesight when connecting things in back of the equipment not to be on when I was working quasi land with 5 watts. The condescending attitude displayed in your pontification is like many hams I have run across in the last 40 years of this endeavor and causes our service to loose valuable young people. Unfortunately I am not young but on the other hand I have been around enough to recognize those who would lord over others from a "technical" standpoint. Yep there Ed I have used bypass caps, torroids, made brute force filters etc. to make my operating a bit more enjoyable ...now if they only had a filter for your type of letter and attitude we all would be ahead. 73 Tom Popovic KI3R |
"garigue" wrote in message ... You can either accept the responsibility to control EMI in your hobby, or go back to 11 meters and cable TV. Ed WB6WSN Ya know Ed I have never met you so I can't say for sure if you are a pontificating idiot or not. I have never been on CB and the cable TV is mostly the History Channel and such. A "teaching post" , albeit boring, would be acceptable but the above zinger is not funny nor complimentary of the guys on this thread. My installing of the halogens were from the point of my back 9 of life eyesight when connecting things in back of the equipment not to be on when I was working quasi land with 5 watts. The condescending attitude displayed in your pontification is like many hams I have run across in the last 40 years of this endeavor and causes our service to loose valuable young people. Unfortunately I am not young but on the other hand I have been around enough to recognize those who would lord over others from a "technical" standpoint. Yep there Ed I have used bypass caps, torroids, made brute force filters etc. to make my operating a bit more enjoyable ...now if they only had a filter for your type of letter and attitude we all would be ahead. 73 Tom Popovic KI3R Tom: You can tell if I'm "pontificating" by reading my text and determining the validity of my advice. OTOH, I am getting weary of people who choose a hobby that involves RF propagation, and then get all whiney when they add an obviously noisy RF source to their environment. If you want to be a ham, then I'm going to hold you to a higher standard. And what should be an example of not meeting that standard? As for "losing valuable young people"; well, if some guy tells me his arc-welding hobby interferes with his DX contesting, well, that's just too pathetic for futher comment. As a self-declared "old guy", I would expect you to understand the concept of minimum standrds of performance. Remember when FCC exams really meant something? You sound all "new-age touchy-feely", finding personal insult in a general comment about performance standards. Now I'm truly sorry that you interpreted my post that way, and it's too bad you couldn't say something about the technical content. I will apologize to any technically apt CB'ers and TV viewers who also may share your sadness, but reasons of visual ability, dexterity and age don't excuse lack of basic RF understanding. BTW, there IS a filter for my type of post. (True, the best filter would be your ability to understand a post.) You can simply ignore my postings, as I always post from the same account and I clearly identify myself. You could also set up an automated filter process, but then that would require technical competence in software operation, and that brings up a whole new area in which you may find offense. Best we not go there. -- Ed WB6WSN El Cajon, CA USA |
"garigue" wrote in message ... You can either accept the responsibility to control EMI in your hobby, or go back to 11 meters and cable TV. Ed WB6WSN Ya know Ed I have never met you so I can't say for sure if you are a pontificating idiot or not. I have never been on CB and the cable TV is mostly the History Channel and such. A "teaching post" , albeit boring, would be acceptable but the above zinger is not funny nor complimentary of the guys on this thread. My installing of the halogens were from the point of my back 9 of life eyesight when connecting things in back of the equipment not to be on when I was working quasi land with 5 watts. The condescending attitude displayed in your pontification is like many hams I have run across in the last 40 years of this endeavor and causes our service to loose valuable young people. Unfortunately I am not young but on the other hand I have been around enough to recognize those who would lord over others from a "technical" standpoint. Yep there Ed I have used bypass caps, torroids, made brute force filters etc. to make my operating a bit more enjoyable ...now if they only had a filter for your type of letter and attitude we all would be ahead. 73 Tom Popovic KI3R Tom Although I can see your point about Ed's sharp tongue, he is likely a techincally bright guy who is as intolerant of old guys like you and me who make more mistakes than we'd like. I'm 74 and used to be a fairly active antenna making ham in the 1960s. But, I dont know crap compared to the guys who currently study about antennas and electronics. I'd bet that you and I will have more comfort if we dont get overly excited when we get yelled at for writing things that dont quite fit with the current level of 'technical knowledge'. There is so much really good technical guidance available within this news group that it doesnt make any sense for us old guys to get upset when we get insulted. I've found it alot easir to read around most criticism. That way I can continue to enjoy this nifty way of keeping aware of antenna development (without having to go back to books and class rooms). You are welcome to tell me to F888 off if this post offends. I only offer it as a way of showing that even though I see your point, I also consider it so unimportant that you and I get yelled at occasionally. Jerry |
"Jerry Martes" wrote in message news:Xe44e.23340$k66.15439@trnddc03... "garigue" wrote in message ... You can either accept the responsibility to control EMI in your hobby, or go back to 11 meters and cable TV. Ed WB6WSN Ya know Ed I have never met you so I can't say for sure if you are a pontificating idiot or not. 73 Tom Popovic KI3R Tom Although I can see your point about Ed's sharp tongue, he is likely a techincally bright guy who is as intolerant of old guys like you and me who make more mistakes than we'd like. Jerry Things are getting too fuzzy here, so I'll try to sharpen the focus a bit. First, you self-declared "old guys" have only about a decade and a half seniority on me. I have always tried to respect ability, regardless of the age of its holder. OTOH, old jerks are still jerks. Second, I have met myself, and I can assure you that I can be considered an idiot (having already progressed through the grades of imbecile and moron) . But I try mightily to never pontificate. Third. silver-tongued, omniscient orators sometimes close with a zinger that's a bit too barbed, so I again apologize if my karma ran over your dogma. -- Ed WB6WSN El Cajon, CA USA |
Gee Ed, I don't even have a dog in this hunt, and read this newsgroup only in hopes of learning something every now and then. But, your responses ARE offensive and your comments generally negate any wisdom you bring to the subject. I'll tell you how I try to keep things civil in one of these conversations. In every case, I try to respond and conduct myself as if the other fellows were standing in front of me eye to eye. Most of us would try to be diplomatic, even to a complete stranger, in that situation. In some parts of the country, or in another time, doing otherwise would earn you a punch. Anyway, I DO know how to filter out your posts and you've certainly earned your position on that list. 73, Floyd - K8AC |
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:57:59 -0700, "Ed Price" wrote:
You can either accept the responsibility to control EMI in your hobby, or go back to 11 meters and cable TV. Ed WB6WSN Well, I've got a buzz at my qth, and unplugging the warts, outdoor lights, florescents and damn near everything else in the house hasn't solved my buzzzzz -- oh well, onward in understanding rf energy and the vagaries of its creation... maybe I need to buy a bb gun and start shooting out the streetlights... :-) bob k5qwg |
"Bob Miller" wrote in message ... On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:57:59 -0700, "Ed Price" wrote: You can either accept the responsibility to control EMI in your hobby, or go back to 11 meters and cable TV. Ed WB6WSN Well, I've got a buzz at my qth, and unplugging the warts, outdoor lights, florescents and damn near everything else in the house hasn't solved my buzzzzz -- oh well, onward in understanding rf energy and the vagaries of its creation... maybe I need to buy a bb gun and start shooting out the streetlights... :-) bob k5qwg Bob: You are on the right track; a process of elimination is often the fastest way to identify the noise source. But don't underestimate the wonders of seemingly prosaic household systems. Microprocessor controllers are everywhere, from your washing machine to your sprinkler controllers to your furnace controls. And that's just YOUR house, your neighbors all have their own sources to add to the general noise level. Try a battery-powered AM radio, tuned between stations. See if you can locate the noise with the built-in directional loopstick antenna. Even if the noise is being radiated from a number of powerlines, you can still try cutting power for your entire house. OTOH, some gadgets will have battery backup, so, like my sprinkler controls, the microprocessor keeps right on running even when I cut off the power. Neighbors are notoriously uncooperative when you suggest cutting off the power to their house while you search for RF noise. -- Ed WB6WSN El Cajon, CA USA |
"Floyd Sense" wrote in message ... Gee Ed, I don't even have a dog in this hunt, and read this newsgroup only in hopes of learning something every now and then. But, your responses ARE offensive and your comments generally negate any wisdom you bring to the subject. I'll tell you how I try to keep things civil in one of these conversations. In every case, I try to respond and conduct myself as if the other fellows were standing in front of me eye to eye. Most of us would try to be diplomatic, even to a complete stranger, in that situation. In some parts of the country, or in another time, doing otherwise would earn you a punch. Anyway, I DO know how to filter out your posts and you've certainly earned your position on that list. 73, Floyd - K8AC I am surprised that you would favor the person-to-person model, since you appear to be willing to ignore my two attempts at conciliation and appear to enjoy remaining in a self-aggreived condition. As you point out, certain attitudes in certain places can earn you the flat-face award, and you seem to be a determined candidate. One of the hallmarks of wisdom is knowing when you are being insulted and when you are being presented with an uncomfortable reminder of your condition. As an Extra, do you really think that a ham should be surprised to find that an arc-discharge luminary, placed in proximity to his rig, causes RFI? I hold a ham to a slightly higher standard of understanding of RFI than I would expect of the general populace. RF noise is a very basic part of the RF communication hobby known as ham radio, so just how low should the bar be set for understanding of the basics of your hobby? If the basics are too challenging for you, then perhaps you should either get smarter or live within a less demanding cohort. And just what electronics hobbies could those be? CB radio certainly comes to mind; a venue of zero examinations and largely technically incompetent appliance operators. And below that, cable TV, where the two big challenges are finding the power button and a channel. Your functional competence in communicating within Usenet is also deficient, as you sent a redundant copy of your post to my personal address. Please try to learn the difference between replying to a post in a newsgroup and replying to the poster's address (especially when the poster affords you the courtesy of a non-spoofed address). I find it amusing that you deem I should get TWO copies of YOUR post, while you publicly declare that my posts are unfit for your attention. Further, your declared existence in this group, that you "read this newsgroup only in hopes of learning something every now and then", is selfish and parasitic. Usenet is a participatory forum, and you should try to find satisfaction in contributing as well as in taking. Finally, I don't know if you intended pithy sarcasm, or simply displayed further evidence of senility, by signing your missive with a "73". After insulting my intentions, you close with the generally accepted icon for "best wishes" or "cheers". Thank you for the complete reversal of your entire thought process in the space of one line! I must assume that the closing salutation must have been appended AFTER you took your daily meds. -- Ed WB6WSN El Cajon, CA USA |
You can either accept the responsibility to control EMI in your hobby, or go back to 11 meters and cable TV. Ed WB6WSN Well, I've got a buzz at my qth, and unplugging the warts, outdoor lights, florescents and damn near everything else in the house hasn't solved my buzzzzz -- oh well, onward in understanding rf energy and the vagaries of its creation... maybe I need to buy a bb gun and start shooting out the streetlights... :-) bob k5qwg Hi Bob ...... wherein lies the "nut" in this whole conumdrum. These RF generating devises should not even be on shore. I think that Great Britian still has, or in the past, a very strict set of rules regarding devises. Proper engineering, with I venture to say minimal cost, would clean up things significantly. Even if every ham had an EE and thoroughly understood every detail of this problem ..... what would we do with Mrs. Jones next door or better yet in the next apartment. As Ed had mentioned some are not too responsive to having us bypass the speakers on their new 5K$ electric organ. 73 KI3R Tom Popovic Belle Vernon Pa. |
Tom Although I can see your point about Ed's sharp tongue, he is likely a techincally bright guy who is as intolerant of old guys like you and me who make more mistakes than we'd like. I'm 74 and used to be a fairly active antenna making ham in the 1960s. But, I dont know crap compared to the guys who currently study about antennas and electronics. I'd bet that you and I will have more comfort if we dont get overly excited when we get yelled at for writing things that dont quite fit with the current level of 'technical knowledge'. There is so much really good technical guidance available within this news group that it doesnt make any sense for us old guys to get upset when we get insulted. I've found it alot easir to read around most criticism. That way I can continue to enjoy this nifty way of keeping aware of antenna development (without having to go back to books and class rooms). You are welcome to tell me to F888 off if this post offends. I only offer it as a way of showing that even though I see your point, I also consider it so unimportant that you and I get yelled at occasionally. Jerry Hi Jerry ....there would be absolutely no reason to tell you do anything concerning the above post. I look upon the newgroups in a positive way to share information. I have drawn ire from some in the past but maybe those individuals will think the next time they hit the send key. There are plenty of people who follow these groups who don't send messages and I feel a good part of them are young people who are interested. I remember those times as a teenager just starting out and being treated quite poorly by some OTers. We really need to remember what we were like starting out and the errors we made. As for getting yelled at ......you must be married ..... as my dad once told me ...the best 2 words are yes dear .... and boy he was right. 73 Jerry ....... Tom KI3R |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com