Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article WZs4e.286004$FM3.125440@fed1read02,
Ed Price wrote: #snip# As an Extra, do you really think that a ham should be surprised to find that an arc-discharge luminary, placed in proximity to his rig, causes RFI? What "arc-discharge luminary"? The OP referred to a 120-volt halogen lamp, "no transformer". The standard, commonly-available consumer device which fits this description uses a tungsten filament in a halogen atmosphere - it's a simple spin on an ordinary incandescent bulb. There's no arc discharge involved in the operation of such bulbs, and in the absence of a switching regulator or dimmer I know of no reason why such lamps would be more likely to generate RFI than a standard incandescent lamp. I see nothing in the OP's query to suggest that he was referring to a high-intensity discharge bulb, which would require a ballast of some sort and which could certainly generate RF. Your functional competence in communicating within Usenet is also deficient, as you sent a redundant copy of your post to my personal address. Please try to learn the difference between replying to a post in a newsgroup and replying to the poster's address (especially when the poster affords you the courtesy of a non-spoofed address). In defense of the gentleman to whom you are responding, I would point out that the convention of "post a reply to the public newsgroup or mailing list, and send a courtesy copy to the individual's mailbox" has been in use on the Internet for at least 15 years, and probably more. Some people like receiving courtesy copies, some dislike it, and I agree that one should respect the individual recipient's choice when it is known. I do not agree that the poster was out of line or "deficient" in sending you a courtesy copy of his posting. For what it's worth, Ed, my own immediate reaction to several of your postings was to conclude that they were unnecessarily contemptuous. I think that your advice would be more successfully received, and thus more effective, if it were delivered in a tone which was, shall we say, less snotty? -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cleaning House Sale on Equipment | Swap | |||
Halogen lights QRM?? | Boatanchors | |||
Lamps? | Homebrew | |||
Lamps? | Swap | |||
Labor Day Sale | Scanner |