RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Antenna (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/)
-   -   can you tx.on a tv antenna (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/68375-can-you-tx-tv-antenna.html)

Butch April 6th 05 08:59 PM

To the gentleman who posted the original to this thread: QST had an
article on how to convert a particular tv antenna to a vhf t/r antenna.
I can't recall how long ago, perhaps in the fall or summer.

KF5DE

Cecil Moore wrote:
Henry Kolesnik wrote:

Cecil
Good thought. As I understand it a receiver doesn't really need any
power, so if the antenna is 50 ohms and the Rx input is say 1000 ohms
most of the power has to be relflected to the antenna.



Make it one megohm and virtually all receive power in
a perfectly matched antenna is lost to re-radiation?
So by astute choice of feedline length we can choose
constructive interference or destructive interference
in the re-radiated signals? :-)


Richard Harrison April 6th 05 09:42 PM

Henty Kolesnik wrote:
"How about a little more explanation on the 50% reradiation?"

The antenna doesn`t care where the power comes from. It can be from
connected drive or induced. Induced power has two loads, radiation
resistance and connected load (receiver input). If they are matched
(equal), 50% is absorbed in each.

If they are mismatched, paximum power transfer can`t occur. A higher
percentage of the available energy will be rejected or reradiated
because the receiver input is nearer to an open circuit (rejection) or a
short circuit (reradiation) than it is when it is matched to the
antenna`s radiation resistance.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KBWZI


Richard Harrison April 6th 05 10:10 PM

Cecil, W5DXP wrote:
"If we simply amplify the receiver voltage through a near infinite
impedance FET with virtually no load on the signal, do we get the signal
information?"

Not as much as possible.

Just as the reactance must be tuned out of an antenna to receive maximum
available power, to get maximum received carrier power, the resistance
of the load in the antenna must be reduced to only that matcing the
radiation resistance. Walter Maxwell, W2DU has had it right all along.
Maximum power transfer requires a conjugate match.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI


Henry Kolesnik April 6th 05 10:16 PM

OK....I think I uderstand the transmitter side, perhaps a little better. If
a 50 ohm transmitter is matched to a 50 ohm antenna there is no reflection
and all the power is radiated. If the antenna is not 50 ohms then there is
reflected power from the antenna to the transmitter and since the
transmitter cannot absorb power it reflects it to the antenna ad infinitum.
I also know that electric power generating station don't like a match
because a 50/50 deal is not good for profits. I understand the transmitter
and power generator however I'm having trouble getting my mind around whats
happening with the receiver and antenna. Can it be put another way so I can
try to understand it?
tnx

--

73
Hank WD5JFR
"Richard Harrison" wrote in message
...
Henty Kolesnik wrote:
"How about a little more explanation on the 50% reradiation?"

The antenna doesn`t care where the power comes from. It can be from
connected drive or induced. Induced power has two loads, radiation
resistance and connected load (receiver input). If they are matched
(equal), 50% is absorbed in each.

If they are mismatched, paximum power transfer can`t occur. A higher
percentage of the available energy will be rejected or reradiated
because the receiver input is nearer to an open circuit (rejection) or a
short circuit (reradiation) than it is when it is matched to the
antenna`s radiation resistance.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KBWZI




Jim Kelley April 6th 05 10:48 PM



Richard Harrison wrote:

Cecil, W5DXP wrote:
"If we simply amplify the receiver voltage through a near infinite
impedance FET with virtually no load on the signal, do we get the signal
information?"

Not as much as possible.

Just as the reactance must be tuned out of an antenna to receive maximum
available power, to get maximum received carrier power, the resistance
of the load in the antenna must be reduced to only that matcing the
radiation resistance. Walter Maxwell, W2DU has had it right all along.
Maximum power transfer requires a conjugate match.


I happend across this just the other day. On page 1426, "Physics:
Volume Two Electricity, Magnetism, and Light", Ronald Blum/Duane E.
Roller it reads "Note that the optimum power transfer occurs when p=0,
R=Z0, and t=1. [p and t are reflection and transmission coefficients]
In general, for lossy lines, this takes place when the load impedance in
the complex conjugate of the characteristic impedance, just as with
lumped circuits."

Seems to be the only way for p = (R-Z0)/(R+Z0) = 0 and
t = 2R/R+Z0 = 1 to hold true for any Z0.

ac6xg

ac6xg

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI



Richard Clark April 6th 05 11:43 PM

On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 21:16:53 GMT, "Henry Kolesnik"
wrote:

If the antenna is not 50 ohms then there is
reflected power from the antenna to the transmitter and since the
transmitter cannot absorb power it reflects it to the antenna ad infinitum.


Hi Hank,

This again points out the fallacy of treating different matches as
having equal outcomes.

A simple, intuitive test of your statement about would ask the
question:
"Who needs a tuner for mismatches then?"

No doubt the thread will enlarge with discourse on the theory of
Thevenin (Norton by implication), Conjugation, Efficiency, Max
available power, Max power transfer, and any number of other mantras
dear to the heart. And yet none of them will explain that if we have:
transmitter cannot absorb power it reflects it to the antenna ad infinitum.

"Who needs a tuner for mismatches then?"

Saving a few hundred rounds of such non-answers, and suspecting if I
held feet to the fire, the discussion would then turn to answering
"Who needs a tuner for mismatches then?"
in terms of psychology:
"A tuner makes the transmitter happy."

A such, it reduces to the economy of time. If you are in this hobby
long enough, the investment in a tuner will yield that same level of
transmitter happiness at a lesser expense than would monthly visits to
the pharmacist for Prozac.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Hal Rosser April 7th 05 02:36 AM


"ken wood" wrote in message
...
can you tx on a tv antenna



yep. The tv stations do it all the time.
many hams have used those rabbit-ears for 2-meter work



Cecil Moore April 7th 05 02:32 PM

Richard Harrison wrote:

Cecil, W5DXP wrote:
"If we simply amplify the receiver voltage through a near infinite
impedance FET with virtually no load on the signal, do we get the signal
information?"

Not as much as possible.

Just as the reactance must be tuned out of an antenna to receive maximum
available power, to get maximum received carrier power, the resistance
of the load in the antenna must be reduced to only that matcing the
radiation resistance. Walter Maxwell, W2DU has had it right all along.
Maximum power transfer requires a conjugate match.


But the information in a received signal can be had while
consuming very little of the received signal's power. For
instance, ten feet of wire into my IC-756PRO results in
perfect reception of Neal Boortz on WTAW on 1620 kHz.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Richard Harrison April 7th 05 08:54 PM

Cecil, W5DXP wrote:
"But the information in a received signal can be had while consuming
very little of the received signal`s power."

Very true, but with AM, or even with weak FM signals, below the "FM
Improvement Threshold", the modulation recovered varies directly with
the strength of the received carrier

Receiver alignment instructions often advise using a modulated signal
from the generator which is weak to ensure operating in a region where
there is a dB to dB relationship between the received carrier strength
and the demodulated signal strength.

You can probably hear Neal Boortz on Aggieland`s 1620 kHz without a
receiver.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI


Richard Fry April 7th 05 11:20 PM

"Richard Harrison" wrote
Very true, but with AM, or even with weak FM signals, below the "FM
Improvement Threshold", the modulation recovered varies directly with
the strength of the received carrier

_____________

But -- isn't program audio recovered in FM systems a function of carrier
deviation, only? The threshold deals only with the amount of noise present
with it.

RF



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com