Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Crazy George wrote:
"Hal Rosser" wrote in message news ![]() I recall reading about an impedence matching technique where the conductors of, say a coax segment, would be spaced slowly more and more apart (like the braid becoming larger like the shape of a funnel) and extending until only one conductor (the center conductor) is required for transmission. A similar setup at the other end of the run would transform the impedence back to usable levels. The drawings in the article portrayed the transformation as appearing like a funnel flaring out slowly with the center conductor eventually the only conductor - then the same setup at the other end. The idea of a single-conductor transmission line makes it an inviting idea, but physically building the impedence matching sections on the ends look like a real challenge. Google "G-Line". That's the name. It was once promoted as an alternative to large waveguide for UHF transmission, until low-loss coax came on the scene. Unfortunately G-line has a number of practical problems, all involved with keeping the propagating EM field attached to the single wire, and preventing it from radiating like a long-wire antenna. If the line radiates, that energy fails to reach its destination at the other end - which of course means loss. I don't understand the detailed EM physics, but G-line does not use the same TEM mode as coax or parallel line. Basically, Nature never intended an EM field to propagate along a single wire, so it's always trying to fall off and radiate. To keep the field attached, the wire needs a fairly thick, low-loss dielectric covering (bare wire won't work). The line also needs to be straight and uninterrupted, so practical installation is extremely critical. G-line is always trying to become a long-wire antenna. Make any mistakes, and that's exactly what you'll get. Coax of course is the complete opposite, so Heliax and other forms of low-loss hardline have wiped G-line off the map. For many years it has been nothing more than a technological curiosity. But now it seems to have made a reappearance as a carrier for BPL. Yet the same basic problem is still the in any practical installation, G-line is *always* trying to become a radiating long-wire antenna. -- 73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] | Shortwave | |||
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] | Shortwave | |||
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] | Shortwave | |||
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] | Shortwave | |||
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] | Info |